ML Fusion V1.0

6 нояб.

ML Fusion - Forward-Looking Indicator Validation System
CORE INNOVATION: WHY THIS IS NOT JUST "COMBINED INDICATORS"
Standard Approach (What other Scripts Do):
Signal = Average of [Indicator1, Indicator2, Indicator3...]
All indicators get equal weight forever. No validation of whether predictions were accurate.
ML Fusion's Unique Approach:
1. Each indicator makes a PREDICTION: "Price will be higher/lower in 5 bars"
2. System WAITS and VALIDATES: Was the prediction correct?
3. Tracks prediction accuracy over 100+ forecasts per indicator
4. Adjusts weights based on measured validation rates
5. Continuously adapts as market conditions change
Key Distinction: This is a prediction validation engine that happens to use indicators as input sources, not a simple indicator combination tool.

This is original Idea.
1. Forward-Looking Prediction Architecture
• Innovation: Indicators make directional forecasts N bars ahead (user configurable)
• Storage System: Arrays track pending predictions with timestamps
• Validation Engine: After N bars, compares prediction vs actual price movement
• Result Tracking: Maintains separate evaluation arrays for each indicator's historical accuracy
Why This Matters: Most scripts analyze current conditions. This system validates forecasted outcomes.
2. Dual-Performance Measurement System
• Overall Validation Rate: Lifetime accuracy across all predictions (shows long-term reliability)
• Recent Validation Rate: Last 20 predictions only (detects regime changes)
• Divergence Analysis: When recent < overall, indicates regime shift in progress
• Confidence Metrics: Tracks sample size to determine statistical reliability
Why This Matters: Detects when indicators stop working BEFORE major losses occur.
3. Adaptive Weight Optimization Algorithm
Performance Score = (Correct Predictions / Total Predictions) × EMA Smoothing
Target Weight = Individual Performance / Sum of All Performance
Current Weight → Target Weight (governed by Learning Rate)
Minimum Weight Floor prevents complete indicator exclusion
Normalization ensures weights always sum to 100%
Why This Matters: Weights automatically shift from failing indicators to working ones based on measurable results, not opinion.
4. Market Regime Detection Through Weight Patterns
• Trend Regime Observable: SuperTrend + Linear Regression weights increase (>25% combined)
• Range Regime Observable: CPR + ORB + PDH/PDL weights increase (>30% combined)
• Transition Regime Observable: All weights converge toward equal (~14% each)
• Educational Framework: Users learn to recognize regimes by watching weight distribution
Why This Matters: System teaches market structure recognition through observable quantitative changes.
5. Component Selection Strategy - Complementary Coverage
The 7 indicators weren't randomly chosen - they provide complementary market coverage:
Directional Cluster (4 indicators):
• SuperTrend (volatility-based)
• Moving Average (momentum-based)
• VWAP (volume-weighted)
• Linear Regression (slope-based)
These excel when markets are trending but fail when ranging.
Structural Cluster (3 indicators):
• CPR - Daily/weekly pivot calculations
• ORB - Opening range breakout levels
• PDH/PDL - Previous period high/low levels
These excel when markets are ranging but fail when trending.
The Strategy: When one cluster's validation rates decline, the other typically improves. Adaptive weighting automatically shifts allocation to the working cluster.

HOW THE SYSTEM ACTUALLY WORKS (TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION)
Phase 1: Prediction Recording (Every Bar)
For each of 7 indicators:
Generate current signal (1.0 = bullish forecast, 0.0 = bearish forecast)
Store signal in pending_predictions array
Store current bar_index in prediction_bars array
Store actual close price for later comparison
Phase 2: Prediction Evaluation (After N Bars)
For oldest prediction in queue:
Calculate bars_elapsed = current_bar_index - prediction_bar_index

If bars_elapsed >= prediction_horizon:
Compare: Did price move in forecasted direction?
Record result: Aligned (1.0) or Not Aligned (0.0)
Move to evaluated_predictions array
Move to results array
Remove from pending queue
Phase 3: Performance Calculation (Continuous)
For each indicator over last 100 validated predictions:
Count correct forecasts
Validation Rate = Correct / Total
Apply EMA smoothing (reduces noise from single prediction)

Calculate recent performance (last 20 predictions separately)
Track divergence between overall and recent rates
Phase 4: Weight Optimization (Continuous)
Sum total performance across all indicators
Calculate target weight = individual_performance / total_performance
Enforce minimum weight floor (prevents zero allocation)

Gradually move current weight toward target:
new_weight = old_weight + (learning_rate × performance_confidence × weight_difference)

Normalize all weights to sum to 100%
Phase 5: Signal Generation
Composite Signal = Σ(Indicator_Signal × Normalized_Weight)
Apply EMA smoothing for stability
Compare to thresholds:
≥0.75 = Strong Buy
≥0.60 = Buy
≤0.40 = Sell
≤0.25 = Strong Sell

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES NOT FOUND IN ALTERNATIVES
1. Transparent Performance Tracking
Dashboard displays for each indicator:
• Current signal direction
• Current weight allocation
• Overall validation rate (all-time)
• Recent validation rate (last 20 predictions)
• Performance improvement vs equal-weight baseline
Users see EXACTLY which indicators are working and which aren't, with quantified measurements.
2. Self-Awareness and Warnings
System monitors its own effectiveness:
• "WARMING UP" status during initial learning phase (<20 samples)
• "TRAINED" status when sufficient data collected
• "LOW ACCURACY" warning when validation rates drop below 45%
• Confidence metrics show reliability of current weights
Most indicators never tell you when they're not working. This one does.
3. Multi-Timeframe Validation Analysis
• Calculates composite signals on 6 user-configurable timeframes
• Displays trend direction and signal strength for each timeframe
• Color-coded strength indicators (red <25%, orange 25-50%, green 50-75%, dark green >75%)
• Helps identify multi-timeframe alignment or divergence
4. Real-Time Position Tracking
• Tracks entry prices for long and short positions
• Calculates unrealized P&L on open positions
• Maintains historical points gained/lost over configurable lookback period
• Separates long points from short points
• Displays average points per trade
• All calculations based on actual signal execution, not cherry-picked examples
5. Automatic Target and Stop Loss Visualization
• Draws target and stop loss lines based on percentage from entry
• Updates only when new signals fire (prevents line clutter)
• Configurable: percentage levels, line extension, label display
• Option to draw only on confirmed bars (anti-repainting)

WHY COMBINE THESE SPECIFIC 7 INDICATORS (DETAILED RATIONALE)
The Problem with Single Indicators
Each indicator type has inherent weaknesses:
• Trend indicators: Excellent in trends, generate false signals in ranges
• Level indicators: Excellent in ranges, miss trend momentum
• Using just one type: Guarantees poor performance in opposite conditions
The Solution: Strategic Complementary Pairing
Group A - Directional Indicators capture momentum four different ways:
1. SuperTrend: Uses ATR (Average True Range) for volatility-adjusted trend detection. Excels in clear trends, fails in choppy conditions.
2. Moving Average: Pure price momentum measurement. Excels when price moves directionally, lags at turning points.
3. VWAP: Incorporates volume into average price. Excels when institutional participation confirms trend, fails in low-volume or manipulated moves.
4. Linear Regression: Mathematical best-fit slope measurement. Excels in consistent trends, overshoots at reversals.
Why all four? Each captures trend differently. When 3-4 agree, trend confidence is high. When they diverge, transition is occurring.
Group B - Structural Indicators identify support/resistance three different ways:
1. CPR (Central Pivot Range): Mathematical pivot calculations (TC/Pivot/BC). Excels when price respects calculated levels, which happens more in range-bound markets.
2. ORB (Opening Range Breakout): First 15 minutes (configurable) high/low range. Excels when day type (trend vs range day) establishes early, which is common in liquid markets.
3. PDH/PDL: Previous day/week high and low levels. Excels when price respects historical reference points, common in mean-reversion conditions.
Why all three? They provide level confluence. When price is between multiple structural levels, market is likely ranging. When it breaks all three, trending behavior is confirmed.
The Synergy - Why 7 Together
When Group A (directional) validation rates decline to 40-45%, Group B (structural) validation rates typically rise to 60-65%. The opposite also occurs.
Adaptive weighting automatically rotates capital allocation from the underperforming group to the outperforming group based on measured validation rates.
This is not intuition or opinion - it's quantified, measured, and automatically adjusted.

EDUCATIONAL VALUE - PRIMARY PURPOSE
This indicator's main purpose is teaching systematic market analysis through observation:
What You Learn Over 100+ Bars of Observation
Week 1-2: Weight Distribution Patterns
• Watch weights shift between directional and structural indicators
• Observe which indicators gain weight during trends vs ranges
• Notice how all weights equalize during uncertain/transition periods
Week 3-4: Regime Recognition
• Begin predicting weight shifts before they occur
• Recognize early signs of trend-to-range transitions
• Understand why equal weights (uncertainty) often precede volatility
Week 5+: Indicator Behavior Understanding
• Learn which specific market conditions favor which specific indicators
• Develop intuition for when technical analysis is reliable vs unreliable
• Build skill in recognizing when to trade actively vs stay flat
Long-term Educational Outcome: Even without taking signals, users develop quantitative market regime recognition skills that transfer to any trading approach.

REALISTIC PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS
What Historical Testing Shows (Varied Results)
• Strong Trending Markets: 65-75% validation rates common, positive improvement vs equal weights
• Clear Range-Bound Markets: 60-70% validation rates common, positive improvement vs equal weights
• Transition/Choppy Markets: 45-55% validation rates, often negative improvement vs equal weights
• Gap-Heavy Markets: Temporary validation rate degradation around gap events
What This Means
• System works well in clearly defined conditions (trending OR ranging)
• System struggles in undefined/transitional conditions
• System transparently shows when it's struggling (LOW ACCURACY warning)
• Overall results depend heavily on market conditions during evaluation period
Critical Disclaimers
• Not a guaranteed profit system - no such thing exists
• Past validation rates do not predict future rates - market conditions change
• Historical testing results vary widely - depends on timeframe, asset, conditions
• Requires proper risk management - 1-2% position sizing, mandatory stop losses
• Paper trading essential - test extensively before risking capital

USAGE GUIDELINES
Getting Started (First 100 Bars)
1. Add indicator to chart
2. Do not trade - just observe
3. Watch which indicators gain/lose weight in different conditions
4. Note weight patterns when market trends vs ranges
5. Observe what happens to weights during transitions
After Observation Period
1. Wait for "TRAINED" status (≥20 validated predictions)
2. Only consider signals when recent validation rate >50%
3. Avoid trading when all weights are equal (~14% each)
4. Always use stop losses (suggested 1% of capital)
5. Position size 1-2% maximum per trade
Parameter Settings
Default Settings (Recommended Start):
• Learning Period: 100 bars
• Prediction Horizon: 5 bars ahead
• Learning Rate: 0.1 (10% adaptation per update)
• Minimum Samples: 20 predictions before trusting weights
When to Adjust:
• Increase Learning Period if weights fluctuate too rapidly
• Decrease Prediction Horizon for shorter-term trading
• Lower Learning Rate if weights are too reactive
• These should be changed only after 100+ observations
Monitoring System Health
Healthy Indicators:
• Recent validation rate >50%
• Positive improvement vs equal-weight baseline
• Weights varying (not all stuck at 14%)
• "TRAINED" status displayed
Struggling Indicators:
• Recent validation rate <45%
• Negative improvement vs baseline
• All weights converging to equal
• "LOW ACCURACY" warning showing
Action When Struggling:
• Stop taking new signals
• Wait for regime clarity
• Review if market conditions suit technical analysis
• Consider if asset/timeframe is appropriate

LIMITATIONS AND WHEN SYSTEM STRUGGLES
Inherent Limitations
1. Lagging Nature: Takes 10-20 bars to adapt to new regime
2. Sample Size Dependency: Unreliable with <20 validated predictions
3. Gap Event Disruption: Overnight gaps break prediction continuity
4. Novel Pattern Vulnerability: Cannot learn from patterns not in history
5. Not Predictive of News: Cannot forecast fundamental events
Market Conditions Where This Struggles
• Low volatility consolidation: All indicators show similar poor validation
• News-driven markets: Fundamental events override technical patterns
• Low volume assets: Technical patterns less reliable
• Recently listed instruments: Insufficient price history
• Regime transition periods: Weights haven't adjusted to new dynamics yet
What Makes This Transparent
Unlike most indicators that hide poor performance, ML Fusion explicitly shows when it's struggling:
• Displays negative improvement percentages
• Shows declining recent validation rates
• Warns "LOW ACCURACY" when validation <45%
• All weights converging to equal indicates uncertainty
This transparency is a feature, not a bug. Knowing when the system doesn't work is as valuable as knowing when it does.

COMPLIANCE WITH TRADINGVIEW HOUSE RULES
Originality and Usefulness
Original Implementation:
• Forward-looking prediction validation system (not found in standard indicator combinations)
• Dual performance tracking (overall vs recent validation rates)
• Adaptive weight optimization with confidence-adjusted learning
• Market regime detection through weight distribution patterns
• Transparent performance measurement and self-awareness
Useful Educational Framework:
• Teaches market regime recognition systematically
• Demonstrates indicator behavior in different conditions
• Provides quantified validation rather than subjective opinion
• Shows when technical analysis is reliable vs unreliable
Meaningful Description
This description explains:
• What it does: Validates indicator predictions and adjusts weights based on accuracy
• How it does it: Forward prediction → validation → weight adjustment → signal generation
• How to use it: Observation first, then cautious signal usage with proper risk management
• What makes it original: Prediction validation engine vs simple indicator averaging
Vendor Requirements Justification
Why Closed-Source:
1. Proprietary prediction validation architecture
2. Unique adaptive weight optimization algorithm
3. Novel approach to indicator combination (validation-based vs opinion-based)
4. Comprehensive performance tracking and self-awareness system
5. Educational framework built on quantified measurements
Why Invite-Only (Currently Free):
• Maintain quality user base who understand educational purpose
• Provide support to users learning systematic analysis
• Future considerations for monetization reserved but not current
• No payment required - access is free upon request
Distinction from Other Alternatives: Other indicator combination scripts simply average signals with fixed weights. This system validates predictions, measures accuracy, adjusts weights based on results, detects regime changes, and transparently shows when it's working vs struggling.
Transparency and Realistic Expectations
• Shows actual validation rates including when negative
• Displays all performance metrics without cherry-picking
• Explicitly warns when accuracy is poor
• States clearly this is educational tool, not guaranteed profit system
• Provides detailed limitations and struggle conditions

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Indicator Components
Directional Indicators:
1. SuperTrend (Period: 10, Multiplier: 3.0, ATR-based)
2. Moving Average (Length: 21, Type: EMA/SMA/WMA/RMA selectable)
3. VWAP (Daily reset, volume-weighted average)
4. Linear Regression (Length: 9, slope-based direction)
Structural Indicators: 5. CPR - Central Pivot Range (Daily/Weekly, TC/Pivot/BC calculations) 6. ORB - Opening Range Breakout (5/15/30/60 minute options) 7. PDH/PDL - Previous Day/Week High/Low levels
Machine Learning Parameters
• Learning Period: 20-500 bars (default 100)
• Prediction Horizon: 1-20 bars ahead (default 5)
• Learning Rate: 0.01-1.0 (default 0.1)
• Minimum Samples: 10-100 (default 20)
• Performance Smoothing: 1-50 EMA period (default 10)
• Minimum Weight Floor: 0.01-0.25 (default 0.05)
Display Features
• Multi-timeframe analysis on 6 configurable timeframes
• Performance table (Tiny/Small/Detailed size options)
• Color-coded signal strength display
• Real-time position tracking with P&L
• Automatic target and stop loss line drawing
• Customizable signal size (Small/Medium/Large)
Array Management
• Separate arrays for pending predictions vs evaluated predictions
• Maximum learning period of 500 bars to manage memory
• Automatic array shifting when capacity reached
• Timestamp tracking for prediction evaluation timing

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Q: Is this profitable? A: Cannot guarantee profitability. Historical validation rates vary widely depending on market conditions. Some periods show positive results, others negative. Success depends on execution, risk management, market conditions, and many factors beyond the indicator itself.
Q: Why not just use one good indicator? A: Single indicators excel in specific conditions but fail in opposite conditions. Strategic combination with adaptive weighting allows automatic rotation between indicator types as market regimes change.
Q: What if all weights are equal (~14%)? A: System is uncertain - no indicator showing clear historical edge. This indicates transitional/choppy market. Best action: don't trade until clarity emerges. This uncertainty signal is valuable information.
Q: How long until ML is reliable? A: Minimum 20 validated predictions for basic function, 50-100 for confidence. System shows "WARMING UP" status until sufficient samples collected. First 20 predictions have high uncertainty.
Q: Why is improvement negative sometimes? A: ML optimization showing lower validation rates than equal-weight baseline. Common during regime transitions, insufficient samples, or unprecedented market patterns. Allow 100+ validations before judging long-term effectiveness.
Q: Can I disable some indicators? A: Yes, toggle "Include in ML" for CPR, ORB, and PDH/PDL. However, complementary coverage works best. Disabling structural indicators leaves only directional ones, which struggle in ranges.
Q: What markets work best? A: Liquid markets with sufficient volume and price history. Struggles on recently listed instruments, low-volume assets, and markets dominated by fundamentals over technicals.
Q: Why closed-source if educational? A: Protects proprietary prediction validation architecture and adaptive optimization algorithms. Educational value comes from observing behavior and learning concepts, not from copying code.

VERSION HISTORY
Current Version: 3.8
Major Updates:
• v3.8: PDH/PDL ML integration, enhanced position tracking with P&L
• v3.6: Customizable multi-timeframe analysis, color-coded strength
• v3.5: Standard pivot levels (R1/R2/R3, S1/S2/S3) added
• v3.2: Multi-timeframe trend analysis feature
• v3.0: ORB integration with ML weight calculation
• v2.6: CPR integration with ML weight calculation
• v1.0: Initial release with core 4-indicator ML system

ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY
Current Status: Invite-only (FREE - no payment required)
Request Access: Through TradingView direct message system only
Why Invite-Only:
• Maintain quality user base who understand educational purpose
• Provide focused support for systematic learning
• Future monetization options reserved (not currently charged)
• Ensure users read description and understand system before use
No Payment Required: This indicator is currently free for all approved users. Future versions may introduce paid tiers if I end up spending significant time, but current access requires no payment.

FINAL SUMMARY
What This System IS:
• Forward-looking prediction validation engine
• Educational framework for market regime recognition
• Systematic approach to indicator evaluation
• Transparent measurement and self-awareness system
• Adaptive optimization based on quantified results
What This System IS NOT:
• Simple indicator averaging script
• Guaranteed profit system
• Suitable for all traders or markets
• Replacement for risk management
• Perfect or infallible
Best Use Case:
Educational tool for learning systematic market analysis through observation of quantified indicator validation patterns, with optional signal usage for experienced traders who understand limitations.
Key Takeaway:
Success depends on using this as a learning framework to develop market regime recognition skills, not as a "set and forget" signal generator. The educational value comes from understanding WHY weights shift, not from blindly following signals.

RISK DISCLAIMERS
Trading Risk:
• Trading involves substantial risk of loss
• Past validation rates do not guarantee future performance
• You can lose more than your initial investment
• Only trade with capital you can afford to lose
No Guarantees:
• No guarantee of profitability in any timeframe
• Historical testing results vary widely by market conditions
• Individual results will differ based on execution and conditions
• System will experience losing periods and drawdowns
Educational Purpose:
• This indicator is for educational purposes only
• Not financial advice or trading recommendations
• You are solely responsible for all trading decisions
• Consult licensed financial advisor before trading
Position Sizing:
• Never risk more than 1-2% per trade
• Always use stop losses on every position
• Paper trade extensively before live trading
• Understand limitations before risking capital

ML Fusion v3.8 - Forward-Looking Indicator Validation System
Educational framework for systematic market analysis through quantified prediction validation and adaptive weight optimization.
Learn first, trade cautiously, manage risk always.

6 нояб.

Информация о релизе

Updated chart