Outsidebar vs Insidebar, Illusion Strategy (by ChartArt)WARNING: This strategy does not work! Please don't trade with this strategy
I'm sharing this strategy for the following three educational reasons:
1. You can easily find 100% strategies, but if they only seem to work 100% on one asset, they actually don't work at all. Therefore never backtest your strategy only on one asset, especially forward testing is useless, because it tends to repeat the old patterns. Your strategy has to work on as many different assets as possible.
2. The pyramiding of orders can have an impact on the strategy. In this case if you manually change the strategy settings by increasing it from 1 to 100 pyramiding orders changes the percent profitable on "UKOIL" monthly from 100% to 90% profitable. On other assets you can see very different results. Allowing much more pyramiding orders in this case results in opening orders where the background color highlights appear.
3. The Tradingview backtest beta version currently does not close the last open trade during the backtest. In this case going long on "UKOIL" near the top in 2011 as this strategy did would result in a big loss in 2015. But since the trade is still open and not canceled out by a new short order it still appears as if this strategy works 100% profitable. Which it doesn't.
Поиск скриптов по запросу "profit"
ISM Indicator As a Strategy Here's a very easy code, plotting the ISM against the SPX. In this exercise, i wanted to see if one could use the ISM indicator only to generate buy/sell signal, and what would be the performance.
What is the ISM
The ISM Manufacturing Index monitors employment, production inventories, new orders and supplier deliveries.By monitoring the ISM Manufacturing Index, investors are able to better understand national economic conditions. When this index is increasing, investors can assume that the stock markets should increase because of higher corporate profits. The opposite can be thought of the bond markets, which may decrease as the ISM Manufacturing Index increases because of sensitivity to potential inflation.
Buy/Sell Signal
ISM above 50 usually good economic condition and vice versa when below 50 . For this code I used 48.50 as my buy/sell signal line.
Results
To test this on a longer time period, I use the SPX index instead of SPY. The results are surprisingly good. 76.92% profitability with 3.03 profit factor.
Conclusion
Investors could use the ISM with other indicators to determine better entry and exit point. I will see if combining the ISM with other custom indicators , could generate better result. Feel free to share your results here.
Cheers
Algo.
MACD + SMA 200 Strategy (by ChartArt)Here is a combination of the classic MACD (moving average convergence divergence indicator) with the classic slow moving average SMA with period 200 together as a strategy.
This strategy goes long if the MACD histogram and the MACD momentum are both above zero and the fast MACD moving average is above the slow MACD moving average. As additional long filter the recent price has to be above the SMA 200. If the inverse logic is true, the strategy goes short. For the worst case there is a max intraday equity loss of 50% filter.
Save another $999 bucks with my free strategy.
This strategy works in the backtest on the daily chart of Bitcoin, as well as on the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average daily charts. Current performance as of November 30, 2015 on the SPX500 CFD daily is percent profitable: 68% since the year 1970 with a profit factor of 6.4. Current performance as of November 30, 2015 on the DOWI index daily is percent profitable: 51% since the year 1915 with a profit factor of 10.8.
All trading involves high risk; past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
CamarillaStrategy -V1 - H4 and L4 breakout - exits addedExits added using trailing stops.
2.6 Profit Factor and 76% Profitable on SPY , 5M - I think it's a pretty good number for an automated strategy that uses Pivots. I don't think it's possible to add volume and day open price in relation to pivot levels -- that's what I do manually ..
Still trying to add EMA for exits.. it will increase profitability. You can play in pinescript with trailing stops entries..
Madrid Trend SqueezeThis study spots the points that are most profitable in the trend with a code color and shape. This also shows trend divergences and possible reversal or reentry points
Keeping the parameters simple, this study only needs one parameter, the length of the base moving average, which by default is set to 34.
There are seven colors used for the study
Green : Uptrend in general
Lime : Spots the current uptrend leg
Aqua : The maximum profitability of the leg in a long trade
The Squeeze happens when Green+Lime+Aqua are aligned (the larger the values the better)
Maroon : Downtrend in general
Red : Spots the current downtrend leg
Fuchsia: The maximum profitability of the leg in a short trade
The Squeeze happens when Maroon+Red+Fuchsia are aligned (the larger the values the better)
Yellow : The trend has come to a pause and it is either a reversal warning or a continuation. These are the entry, re-entry or closing position points.
When either the fuchsia or the aqua colors disappear or shrinks meaningfully it could mean a possible leg exhaustion that will have to be confirmed with the subsequent bars.
When the squeeze color appears without the intermediate color (fuchsia+yellow, fuchsia+maroon, aqua+yellow, aqua+green) it could mean this is just a shake off move, a pump/dump move, a buy the dip or a sell the peak move or a gap.
In the example there are three divergences spotted, the first one between march 2009 and september 2010 when the peaks in the indicator made a lower low, meanwhile the price made a higher high, this is a negative divergence and a trend reversal. On the second example, between april 2013 and July 2013 the indicator made a higher high meanwhile the price made a double bottom, this is a positive divergence and a reversal to the upside.
MTF EMA Traffic Light System Trend Alignment for ScalpersMTF EMA Traffic Light – Trend Bias System
This indicator is designed to help traders quickly identify high-probability trend alignment using multiple timeframes and EMAs.
It analyzes price relative to the 13 EMA and 55 EMA on:
1 Minute
5 Minute
15 Minute
1 Hour
4 Hour
Then it converts that data into a simple Traffic Light system to guide trade decisions.
🚦 How It Works
Each timeframe is classified as:
🟢 BULL – Price above both EMAs
🔴 BEAR – Price below both EMAs
🟡 MIXED – No clear direction
The system focuses on lower-timeframe alignment:
When 1m + 5m + 15m are aligned → Strong setup
When mixed → Caution
When misaligned → Stand aside
🟢 GREEN State (Full Trade Mode)
Triggered when:
✔ 1m, 5m, and 15m are all BULL → Long Bias
✔ 1m, 5m, and 15m are all BEAR → Short Bias
Rules:
Full position size
Trade with trend
Look for EMA pullbacks
Let winners run
🟡 YELLOW State (Caution Mode)
Triggered when:
✔ Lower timeframes are mixed
Rules:
Reduce size
Take quick profits
No holding
Defensive trading
🔴 RED State (No Trade)
Triggered when:
✔ No clear alignment
Rules:
Stay out
Mark key levels
Protect capital
📋 Dashboard Panel
The indicator displays a real-time table showing:
Each timeframe’s bias
Overall market state
Trade rules
This allows you to read market structure in seconds without switching charts.
🎯 Best Use
This tool works best for:
✔ Scalping
✔ Intraday trading
✔ Trend continuation setups
✔ EMA pullback strategies
Recommended for:
Forex
Indices
Gold
Crypto
⚠️ Risk Disclaimer
This indicator is a decision-support tool, not a guarantee of profits.
Always use:
Proper risk management
Stop losses
Personal trade rules
Never risk more than you can afford to lose.
EvansThis is a simple math problem:
If your risk-reward ratio is 1:3.
Even if you lose 3 out of 4 trades (a win rate of only 25%), as long as you hit one big win, you'll still break even.
That extra bit of win rate is your pure profit.
📊 How to use it with LuxAlgo?
This script is your "skeleton," and LuxAlgo is your "muscle."
Hearing the green/red alarm: This means your system has detected a DEMA 9/20 crossover.
Confirm with the chart:
If LuxAlgo also shows a dark blue right-pointing arrow at this time, it represents a strong momentum 1:3 opportunity.
If the price is currently in the 0.618 Discount Zone, you must hold this trade.
Hearing the yellow alarm:
This is a reminder that the trend has changed. If you are already in profit but haven't reached a 1:3 ratio, you can consider manually reducing your position by half and then moving your stop loss to the entry point (Break Even), allowing the remaining profits to run without risk.
TSM RSI + Supertrend (ATR SL + Partial Booking) 302026RSI + Supertrend Strategy (ATR Stop-Loss + Partial Profit Booking)
Strategy Objective
This strategy is designed to:
Trade only in strong trends
Avoid false entries using RSI confirmation
Protect capital with a volatility-based (ATR) stop-loss
Book profits in stages to reduce risk and ride big moves
🔧 Indicators Used
1️⃣ Supertrend
Role: Trend direction
Green line → Uptrend
Red line → Downtrend
Settings:
ATR Period: 10
Multiplier: 3
2️⃣ RSI (Relative Strength Index)
Role: Momentum confirmation
RSI above 50 → Bullish strength
RSI below 50 → Bearish strength
Settings:
RSI Length: 14
Level: 50
🟢 BUY (Long Trade) Rules
A BUY trade is taken when all conditions are met:
Supertrend changes from Red to Green
→ Trend turns bullish
RSI is above 50
→ Buying momentum is strong
📌 Entry:
➡️ Enter BUY at the next candle.
🔴 SELL (Short Trade) Rules
A SELL trade is taken when all conditions are met:
Supertrend changes from Green to Red
→ Trend turns bearish
RSI is below 50
→ Selling momentum is strong
📌 Entry:
➡️ Enter SELL at the next candle.
🛑 Stop-Loss (ATR-Based)
Stop-loss is calculated using ATR (Average True Range)
Adapts automatically to market volatility
BUY Trade
SL = Entry Price − (ATR × Multiplier)
SELL Trade
SL = Entry Price + (ATR × Multiplier)
✅ This avoids tight SL in volatile markets and wide SL in calm markets.
🎯 Partial Profit Booking Logic
🔹 First Target (Partial Exit)
50% of the position is booked at 1:1 Risk–Reward
This locks in profits early and reduces risk
🔹 Remaining 50%
Held as long as the Supertrend does not reverse
Exits only when the trend flips
Helps capture big trending moves
🔄 Exit Rules Summary
Situation Action
ATR Stop-Loss hit Full exit
1:1 target reached 50% profit booked
Supertrend flips Remaining 50% exited
⏱️ Best Timeframes
Trading Style Timeframe
Intraday 5 min / 15 min
Swing 1 Hour / Daily
Best markets:
Trending stocks
Index futures
Directional options (CE / PE)
⭐ Why This Strategy Is Powerful
✔ Trades with trend, not against it
✔ RSI filters weak signals
✔ ATR-based SL adjusts to volatility
✔ Partial booking reduces psychological pressure
✔ Lets winners run and cuts losers early
⚠️ Important Notes
Avoid sideways markets
Always backtest before live trading
Risk management is more important than entries.
Institutional Top-Bottom by Herman Sangivera (Papua)Institutional Top-Bottom + Volume Profile by Herman Sangivera ( Papua )
📈 Component Description
Orange Line (POC - Point of Control): This represents the "Fair Value." Institutions view prices far above this line as "Expensive" (Premium) and prices below as "Cheap" (Discount).
Green/Red Boxes (Order Blocks): These are footprints left by big banks. A Green Box is a demand zone where institutional buying occurred, and a Red Box is a supply zone where institutional selling happened.
Institutional Labels: These appear when the RSI Divergence confirms that price momentum is fading, signaling a high-probability reversal (Top or Bottom).
🚀 Trading Strategy Guide
1. The High-Probability Buy Setup (Bottom)
Look for a "Confluence" of these three factors:
Location: Price is trading below the Orange POC line (Discount zone).
The Zone: Price enters or touches a Green Order Block.
The Signal: The "INSTITUTIONAL BUY" label appears.
Entry: Enter Buy at the close of the candle with the label.
Stop Loss: Place it just below the Green Order Block.
Take Profit: Target the Orange POC line or the nearest Red Order Block.
2. The High-Probability Sell Setup (Top)
Look for a "Confluence" of these three factors:
Location: Price is trading above the Orange POC line (Premium zone).
The Zone: Price enters or touches a Red Order Block.
The Signal: The "INSTITUTIONAL SELL" label appears.
Entry: Enter Sell at the close of the candle with the label.
Stop Loss: Place it just above the Red Order Block.
Take Profit: Target the Orange POC line or the nearest Green Order Block.
💡 Pro Tips for Accuracy
Timeframes: For the best results, use 15m for Scalping, and 1H or 4H for Day/Swing Trading.
Wait for the Candle Close: Labels are based on Pivot points. Always wait for the current candle to close to ensure the signal is locked and won't "repaint."
Avoid Flat Markets: This indicator works best when there is volatility. Avoid using it during "choppy" or sideways markets with very low volume.
Econometrics Non Linear Strategy (RSI condition)
This strategy trades StochRSI extremes (OS/OB) but only enters when a Stata-trained logistic model assigns a high probability to the expected direction, then exits via time, probability decay, and/or mean-reversion back to the midline.
I know that many of you simply do not like math, so I will explain this scrip in two ways, the easy way and the mathematical way.
The easy way:
Think of the market like a **rubber band**:
* Sometimes price gets stretched too far down → it often snaps back up.
* Sometimes price gets stretched *too far up → it often snaps back down.
This script is built to:
1. Spot when the rubber band is stretched
2. Decide if it’s a good stretch to trade
3. Enter the trade
4. Exit when the snap-back is likely done
1) It looks for “extreme” moments (Stoch RSI)
The script uses a tool called the Stochastic RSI to tell if price is:
* Oversold = price got pushed down too hard (stretched down)
* Overbought = price got pushed up too hard (stretched up)
So, the script basically waits for:
* Oversold → “maybe buy”
* Overbought → “maybe sell”
2) It doesn’t trade every extreme (because many extremes fail)
This is the important part:
Even if something looks oversold/overbought, it doesn’t always bounce immediately.
So the script adds a smart filter:
* It gives each situation a score from 0% to 100%
* That score means: “How likely is it that this trade is worth taking?”
If the score isn’t high enough → the script does nothing.
3) It only enters trades when the score is high enough
You choose a number like 0.78 (78%).
* If the script thinks the chance is 78% or more, it enters.
* If it’s lower, it ignores it.
So it’s like:
> “I will only trade when my filter is confident.”
As you see in the image above, the market entered a volatile, sideways state. The model was able to accurately define the extreme lows, enter trades, and then exit with profitability.
4) Optional extra filter: RSI (on/off)
You can turn on an extra rule:
* RSI above 50 might support buying
* RSI below 50 might support selling
(or reversed if you flip it)
This is just a “more strict” option.
How it exits (how it decides when to leave)
The script can exit in 3 simple ways:
A) Time exit
> “If nothing happens after X bars, I’m leaving.”
B) Probability exit
> “If my score drops and the setup no longer looks good, I’m leaving.”
C) Midline exit (mean reversion exit)
> “Once Stoch RSI returns to normal (around the middle), I assume the bounce is done, so I take profit or exit.”
What the controls mean:
* Use Stoch zone gate: only trade when oversold/overbought
* Use probability gate: only trade when the setup score is high enough
* Use RSI gate: add an extra filter (optional)
* Reverse logic: flip the meaning (useful for testing)
* Trade mode + enable longs/shorts: choose long-only, short-only, or both (and it will enforce it)
NOTE!! This script is not FINANCIAL ADVICE. There is no script in the world that is guaranteed to make you money. This strategy is there to help you further confirm any entry based on your own strategy and belief
Here are some downsides to this strategy:
The market is sideways trading and has low volume. With slippage/commission, this strategy fails.
The blue circle is a missed chance at capturing the entire big move. You can then see the red circle contain two losing trades where it completely miss read the market.
When to use this strategy:
When looking at the XAUUSD for example, in an uncertain world, XAUUSD tends to be bullish. It works well when there is a clear trend in any forex pair or commodity.
I recommend you experiment with the settings and maybe build yourself your own winning strategy!
QTechLabs Machine Learning Logistic Regression Indicator [Lite]QTechLabs Machine Learning Logistic Regression Indicator
Ver5.1 1st January 2026
Author: QTechLabs
Description
A lightweight logistic-regression-based signal indicator (Q# ML Logistic Regression Indicator ) for TradingView. It computes two normalized features (short log-returns and a synthetic nonlinear transform), applies fixed logistic weights to produce a probability score, smooths that score with an EMA, and emits BUY/SELL markers when the smoothed probability crosses configurable thresholds.
Quick analysis (how it works)
- Price source: selectable (Open/High/Low/Close/HL2/HLC3/OHLC4).
- Features:
- ret = log(ds / ds ) — short log-return over ret_lookback bars.
- synthetic = log(abs(ds^2 - 1) + 0.5) — a nonlinear “synthetic” feature.
- Both features normalized over a 20‑bar window to range ~0–1.
- Fixed logistic regression weights: w0 = -2.0 (bias), w1 = 2.0 (ret), w2 = 1.0 (synthetic).
- Probability = sigmoid(w0 + w1*norm_ret + w2*norm_synthetic).
- Smoothed probability = EMA(prob, smooth_len).
- Signals:
- BUY when sprob > threshold.
- SELL when sprob < (1 - threshold).
- Visual buy/sell shapes plotted and alert conditions provided.
- Defaults: threshold = 0.6, ret_lookback = 3, smooth_len = 3.
User instructions
1. Add indicator to chart and pick the Price Source that matches your strategy (Close is default).
2. Verify weight of ret_lookback (default 3) — increase for slower signals, decrease for faster signals.
3. Threshold: default 0.6 — higher = fewer signals (more confidence), lower = more signals. Recommended range 0.55–0.75.
4. Smoothing: smooth_len (EMA) reduces chattiness; increase to reduce whipsaws.
5. Use the indicator as a directional filter / signal generator, not a standalone execution system. Combine with trend confirmation (e.g., higher-timeframe MA) and risk management.
6. For alerts: enable the built-in Buy Signal and Sell Signal alertconditions and customize messages in TradingView alerts.
7. Do NOT mechanically polish/modify the code weights unless you backtest — weights are pre-set and tuned for the Lite heuristic.
Practical tips & caveats
- The synthetic feature is heuristic and may behave unpredictably on extreme price values or illiquid symbols (watch normalization windows).
- Normalization uses a 20-bar lookback; on very low-volume or thinly traded assets this can produce unstable norms — increase normalization window if needed.
- This is a simple model: expect false signals in choppy ranges. Always backtest on your instrument and timeframe.
- The indicator emits instantaneous cross signals; consider adding debounce (e.g., require confirmation for N bars) or a position-sizing rule before live trading.
- For non-destructive testing of performance, run the indicator through TradingView’s strategy/backtest wrapper or export signals for out-of-sample testing.
Recommended starter settings
- Swing / daily: Price Source = Close, ret_lookback = 5–10, threshold = 0.62–0.68, smooth_len = 5–10.
- Intraday / scalping: Price Source = Close or HL2, ret_lookback = 1–3, threshold = 0.55–0.62, smooth_len = 2–4.
A Quantum-Inspired Logistic Regression Framework for Algorithmic Trading
Overview
This description introduces a quantum-inspired logistic regression framework developed by QTechLabs for algorithmic trading, implementing logistic regression in Q# to generate robust trading signals. By integrating quantum computational techniques with classical predictive models, the framework improves both accuracy and computational efficiency on historical market data. Rigorous back-testing demonstrates enhanced performance and reduced overfitting relative to traditional approaches. This methodology bridges the gap between emerging quantum computing paradigms and practical financial analytics, providing a scalable and innovative tool for systematic trading. Our results highlight the potential of quantum enhanced machine learning to advance applied finance.
Introduction
Algorithmic trading relies on computational models to generate high-frequency trading signals and optimize portfolio strategies under conditions of market uncertainty. Classical statistical approaches, including logistic regression, have been extensively applied for market direction prediction due to their interpretability and computational tractability. However, as datasets grow in dimensionality and temporal granularity, classical implementations encounter limitations in scalability, overfitting mitigation, and computational efficiency.
Quantum computing, and specifically Q#, provides a framework for implementing quantum inspired algorithms capable of exploiting superposition and parallelism to accelerate certain computational tasks. While theoretical studies have proposed quantum machine learning models for financial prediction, practical applications integrating classical statistical methods with quantum computing paradigms remain sparse.
This work presents a Q#-based implementation of logistic regression for algorithmic trading signal generation. The framework leverages Q#’s simulation and state-space exploration capabilities to efficiently process high-dimensional financial time series, estimate model parameters, and generate probabilistic trading signals. Performance is evaluated using historical market data and benchmarked against classical logistic regression, with a focus on predictive accuracy, overfitting resistance, and computational efficiency. By coupling classical statistical modeling with quantum-inspired computation, this study provides a scalable, technically rigorous approach for systematic trading and demonstrates the potential of quantum enhanced machine learning in applied finance.
Methodology
1. Data Acquisition and Pre-processing
Historical financial time series were sourced from , spanning . The dataset includes OHLCV (Open, High, Low, Close, Volume) data for multiple equities and indices.
Feature Engineering:
○ Log-returns:
○ Technical indicators: moving averages (MA), exponential moving averages
(EMA), relative strength index (RSI), Bollinger Bands
○ Lagged features to capture temporal dependencies
Normalization: All features scaled via z-score normalization:
z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}
● Data Partitioning:
○ Training set: 70% of chronological data
○ Validation set: 15%
○ Test set: 15%
Temporal ordering preserved to avoid look-ahead bias.
Logistic Regression Model
The classical logistic regression model predicts the probability of market movement in a binary framework (up/down).
Mathematical formulation:
P(y_t = 1 | X_t) = \sigma(X_t \beta) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-X_t \beta}}
is the feature matrix at time
is the vector of model coefficients
is the logistic sigmoid function
Loss Function:
Binary cross-entropy:
\mathcal{L}(\beta) = -\frac{1}{N} \sum_{t=1}^{N} \left
MLLR Trading System Implementation
Framework: Utilizes the Microsoft Quantum Development Kit (QDK) and Q# language for quantum-inspired computation.
Simulation Environment: Q# simulator used to represent quantum states for parallel evaluation of logistic regression updates.
Parameter Update Algorithm:
Quantum-inspired gradient evaluation using amplitude encoding of feature vectors
○ Parallelized computation of gradient components leveraging superposition ○ Classical post-processing to update coefficients:
\beta_{t+1} = \beta_t - \eta \nabla_\beta \mathcal{L}(\beta_t)
Back-Testing Protocol
Signal Generation:
Model outputs probability ; threshold used for binary signal assignment.
○ Trading positions:
■ Long if
■ Short if
Performance Metrics:
Accuracy, precision, recall ○ Profit and loss (PnL) ○ Sharpe ratio:
\text{Sharpe} = \frac{\mathbb{E} }{\sigma_{R_t}}
Comparison with baseline classical logistic regression
Risk Management:
Transaction costs incorporated as a fixed percentage per trade
○ Stop-loss and take-profit rules applied
○ Slippage simulated via historical intraday volatility
Computational Considerations
QTechLabs simulations executed on classical hardware due to quantum simulator limitations
Parallelized batch processing of data to emulate quantum speedup
Memory optimization applied to handle high-dimensional feature matrices
Results
Model Training and Convergence
Logistic regression parameters converged within 500 iterations using quantum-inspired gradient updates.
Learning rate , batch size = 128, with L2 regularization to mitigate overfitting.
Convergence criteria: change in loss over 10 consecutive iterations.
Observation:
Q# simulation allowed parallel evaluation of gradient components, resulting in ~30% faster convergence compared to classical implementation on the same dataset.
Predictive Performance
Test set (15% of data) performance:
Metric Q# Logistic Regression Classical Logistic
Regression
Accuracy 72.4% 68.1%
Precision 70.8% 66.2%
Recall 73.1% 67.5%
F1 Score 71.9% 66.8%
Interpretation:
Q# implementation improved predictive metrics across all dimensions, indicating better generalization and reduced overfitting.
Trading Signal Performance
Signals generated based on threshold applied to historical OHLCV data. ● Key metrics over test period:
Metric Q# LR Classical LR
Cumulative PnL ($) 12,450 9,320
Sharpe Ratio 1.42 1.08
Max Drawdown ($) 1,120 1,780
Win Rate (%) 58.3 54.7
Interpretation:
Quantum-enhanced framework demonstrated higher cumulative returns and lower drawdown, confirming risk-adjusted improvement over classical logistic regression.
Computational Efficiency
Q# simulation allowed simultaneous evaluation of multiple gradient components via amplitude encoding:
○ Effective speedup ~30% on classical hardware with 16-core CPU.
Memory utilization optimized: feature matrix dimension .
Numerical precision maintained at to ensure stable convergence.
Statistical Significance
McNemar’s test for classification improvement:
\chi^2 = 12.6, \quad p < 0.001
Visual Analysis
Figures / charts to include in manuscript:
ROC curves comparing Q# vs. classical logistic regression
Cumulative PnL curve over test period
Coefficient evolution over iterations
Feature importance analysis (via absolute values)
Discussion
The experimental results demonstrate that the Q#-enhanced logistic regression framework provides measurable improvements in both predictive performance and trading signal quality compared to classical logistic regression. The increase in accuracy (72.4% vs. 68.1%) and F1 score (71.9% vs. 66.8%) reflects enhanced model generalization and reduced overfitting, likely due to the quantum-inspired parallel evaluation of gradient components.
The trading performance metrics further reinforce these findings. Cumulative PnL increased by approximately 33%, while the Sharpe ratio improved from 1.08 to 1.42, indicating superior risk adjusted returns. The reduction in maximum drawdown (1,120$ vs. 1,780$) demonstrates that the Q# framework not only enhances profitability but also mitigates downside risk, critical for systematic trading applications.
Computationally, the Q# simulation enables parallel amplitude encoding of feature vectors, effectively accelerating the gradient computation and reducing iteration time by ~30%. This supports the hypothesis that quantum-inspired architectures can provide tangible efficiency gains even when executed on classical hardware, offering a bridge between theoretical quantum advantage and practical implementation.
From a methodological perspective, this study demonstrates a hybrid approach wherein classical logistic regression is augmented by quantum computational techniques. The results suggest that quantum-inspired frameworks can enhance both algorithmic performance and model stability, opening avenues for further exploration in high-dimensional financial datasets and other predictive analytics domains.
Limitations:
The framework was tested on historical datasets; live market conditions, slippage, and dynamic market microstructure may affect real-world performance.
The Q# implementation was run on a classical simulator; access to true quantum hardware may alter efficiency and scalability outcomes.
Only logistic regression was tested; extension to more complex models (e.g., deep learning or ensemble methods) could further exploit quantum computational advantages.
Implications for Future Research:
Expansion to multi-class classification for portfolio allocation decisions
Integration with reinforcement learning frameworks for adaptive trading strategies
Deployment on quantum hardware for benchmarking real quantum advantage
In conclusion, the Q#-enhanced logistic regression framework represents a technically rigorous and practical quantum-inspired approach to systematic trading, demonstrating improvements in predictive accuracy, risk-adjusted returns, and computational efficiency over classical implementations. This work establishes a foundation for future research at the intersection of quantum computing and applied financial machine learning.
Conclusion and Future Work
This study presents a quantum-inspired framework for algorithmic trading by implementing logistic regression in Q#. The methodology integrates classical predictive modeling with quantum computational paradigms, leveraging amplitude encoding and parallel gradient evaluation to enhance predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Empirical evaluation using historical financial data demonstrates statistically significant improvements in predictive performance (accuracy, precision, F1 score), risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio), and maximum drawdown reduction, relative to classical logistic regression benchmarks.
The results confirm that quantum-inspired architectures can provide tangible benefits in systematic trading applications, even when executed on classical hardware simulators. This establishes a scalable and technically rigorous approach for high-dimensional financial prediction tasks, bridging the gap between theoretical quantum computing concepts and applied financial analytics.
Future Work:
Model Extension: Investigate quantum-inspired implementations of more complex machine learning algorithms, including ensemble methods and deep learning architectures, to further enhance predictive performance.
Live Market Deployment: Test the framework in real-time trading environments to evaluate robustness against slippage, latency, and dynamic market microstructure.
Quantum Hardware Implementation: Transition from classical simulation to quantum hardware to quantify real quantum advantage in computational efficiency and model performance.
Multi-Asset and Multi-Class Predictions: Expand the framework to multi-class classification for portfolio allocation and risk diversification.
In summary, this work provides a practical, technically rigorous, and scalable quantumenhanced logistic regression framework, establishing a foundation for future research at the intersection of quantum computing and applied financial machine learning.
Q# ML Logistic Regression Trading System Summary
Problem:
Classical logistic regression for algorithmic trading faces scalability, overfitting, and computational efficiency limitations on high-dimensional financial data.
Solution:
Quantum-inspired logistic regression implemented in Q#:
Leverages amplitude encoding and parallel gradient evaluation
Processes high-dimensional OHLCV data
Generates robust trading signals with probabilistic classification
Methodology Highlights: Feature engineering: log-returns, MA, EMA, RSI, Bollinger Bands
Logistic regression model:
P(y_t = 1 | X_t) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-X_t \beta}}
4. Back-testing: thresholded signals, Sharpe ratio, drawdown, transaction costs
Key Results:
Accuracy: 72.4% vs 68.1% (classical LR)
Sharpe ratio: 1.42 vs 1.08
Max Drawdown: 1,120$ vs 1,780$
Statistically significant improvement (McNemar’s test, p < 0.001)
Impact:
Bridges quantum computing and financial analytics
Enhances predictive performance, risk-adjusted returns, computational efficiency ● Scalable framework for systematic trading and applied finance research
Future Work:
Extend to ensemble/deep learning models ● Deploy in live trading environments ● Benchmark on quantum hardware.
Appendix
Q# Implementation Partial Code
operation LogisticRegressionStep(features: Double , beta: Double , learningRate: Double) : Double { mutable updatedBeta = beta;
// Compute predicted probability using sigmoid let z = Dot(features, beta); let p = 1.0 / (1.0 + Exp(-z)); // Compute gradient for (i in 0..Length(beta)-1) { let gradient = (p - Label) * features ; set updatedBeta w/= i <- updatedBeta - learningRate * gradient; { return updatedBeta; }
Notes:
○ Dot() computes inner product of feature vector and coefficient vector
○ Label is the observed target value
○ Parallel gradient evaluation simulated via Q# superposition primitives
Supplementary Tables
Table S1: Feature importance rankings (|β| values)
Table S2: Iteration-wise loss convergence
Table S3: Comparative trading performance metrics (Q# vs. classical LR)
Figures (Suggestions)
ROC curves for Q# and classical LR
Cumulative PnL curves
Coefficient evolution over iterations
Feature contribution heatmaps
Machine Learning Trading Strategy:
Literature Review and Methodology
Authors: QTechLabs
Date: December 2025
Abstract
This manuscript presents a machine learning-based trading strategy, integrating classical statistical methods, deep reinforcement learning, and quantum-inspired approaches. Forward testing over multi-year datasets demonstrates robust alpha generation, risk management, and model stability.
Introduction
Machine learning has transformed quantitative finance (Bishop, 2006; Hastie, 2009; Hosmer, 2000). Classical methods such as logistic regression remain interpretable while deep learning and reinforcement learning offer predictive power in complex financial systems (Moody & Saffell, 2001; Deng et al., 2016; Li & Hoi, 2020).
Literature Review
2.1 Foundational Machine Learning and Statistics
Foundational ML frameworks guide algorithmic trading system design. Key references include Bishop (2006), Hastie (2009), and Hosmer (2000).
2.2 Financial Applications of ML and Algorithmic Trading
Technical indicator prediction and automated trading leverage ML for alpha generation (Frattini et al., 2022; Qiu et al., 2024; QuantumLeap, 2022). Deep learning architectures can process complex market features efficiently (Heaton et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2024).
2.3 Reinforcement Learning in Finance
Deep reinforcement learning frameworks optimize portfolio allocation and trading decisions (Moody & Saffell, 2001; Deng et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2021). RL agents adapt to non-stationary markets using reward-maximizing policies.
2.4 Quantum and Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches
Quantum-inspired techniques enhance exploration of complex solution spaces, improving portfolio optimization and risk assessment (Orus et al., 2020; Chakrabarti et al., 2018; Thakkar et al., 2024).
2.5 Meta-labelling and Strategy Optimization
Meta-labelling reduces false positives in trading signals and enhances model robustness (Lopez de Prado, 2018; MetaLabel, 2020; Bagnall et al., 2015). Ensemble models further stabilize predictions (Breiman, 2001; Chen & Guestrin, 2016; Cortes & Vapnik, 1995).
2.6 Risk, Performance Metrics, and Validation
Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, expected shortfall, and forward-testing are critical for evaluating trading strategies (Sharpe, 1994; Sortino & Van der Meer, 1991; More, 1988; Bailey & Lopez de Prado, 2014; Bailey & Lopez de Prado, 2016; Bailey et al., 2014).
2.7 Portfolio Optimization and Deep Learning Forecasting
Portfolio optimization frameworks integrate deep learning for time-series forecasting, improving allocation under uncertainty (Markowitz, 1952; Bertsimas & Kallus, 2016; Feng et al., 2018; Heaton et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2024).
Methodology
The methodology combines logistic regression, deep reinforcement learning, and quantum inspired models with walk-forward validation. Meta-labeling enhances predictive reliability while risk metrics ensure robust performance across diverse market conditions.
Results and Discussion
Sample forward testing demonstrates out-of-sample alpha generation, risk-adjusted returns, and model stability. Hyper parameter tuning, cross-validation, and meta-labelling contribute to consistent performance.
Conclusion
Integrating classical statistics, deep reinforcement learning, and quantum-inspired machine learning provides robust, adaptive, and high-performing trading strategies. Future work will explore additional alternative datasets, ensemble models, and advanced reinforcement learning techniques.
References
Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley.
Frattini, A. et al. (2022). Financial Technical Indicator and Algorithmic Trading Strategy Based on Machine Learning and Alternative Data. Risks, 10(12), 225. doi.org
Qiu, Y. et al. (2024). Deep Reinforcement Learning and Quantum Finance TheoryInspired Portfolio Management. Expert Systems with Applications. doi.org
QuantumLeap (2022). Hybrid quantum neural network for financial predictions. Expert Systems with Applications, 195:116583. doi.org
Moody, J., & Saffell, M. (2001). Learning to Trade via Direct Reinforcement. IEEE
Transactions on Neural Networks, 12(4), 875–889. doi.org
Deng, Y. et al. (2016). Deep Direct Reinforcement Learning for Financial Signal
Representation and Trading. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning
Systems. doi.org
Li, X., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2020). Deep Reinforcement Learning in Portfolio Management. arXiv:2003.00613. arxiv.org
Jiang, Z. et al. (2017). A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem. arXiv:1706.10059. arxiv.org
FinRL-Podracer, Z. L. et al. (2021). Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Finance. arXiv:2111.05188. arxiv.org
Orus, R., Mugel, S., & Lizaso, E. (2020). Quantum Computing for Finance: Overview and Prospects.
Reviews in Physics, 4, 100028.
doi.org
Chakrabarti, S. et al. (2018). Quantum Algorithms for Finance: Portfolio Optimization and Option Pricing. Quantum Information Processing. doi.org
Thakkar, S. et al. (2024). Quantum-inspired Machine Learning for Portfolio Risk Estimation.
Quantum Machine Intelligence, 6, 27.
doi.org
Lopez de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in Financial Machine Learning. Wiley. doi.org
Lopez de Prado, M. (2020). The Use of MetaLabeling to Enhance Trading Signals. Journal of Financial Data Science, 2(3), 15–27. doi.org
Bagnall, A. et al. (2015). The UEA & UCR Time
Series Classification Repository. arXiv:1503.04048. arxiv.org
Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.
doi.org
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. KDD, 2016. doi.org
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297.
doi.org
Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49–58. doi.org
Sortino, F. A., & Van der Meer, R. (1991).
Downside Risk. Journal of Portfolio Management,
17(4), 27–31. doi.org
More, R. (1988). Estimating the Expected Shortfall. Risk, 1, 35–39.
Bailey, D. H., & Lopez de Prado, M. (2014). Forward-Looking Backtests and Walk-Forward
Optimization. Journal of Investment Strategies, 3(2), 1–20. doi.org
Bailey, D. H., & Lopez de Prado, M. (2016). The Deflated Sharpe Ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management, 42(5), 45–56.
doi.org
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
doi.org
Bertsimas, D., & Kallus, J. N. (2016). Optimal Classification Trees. Machine Learning, 106, 103–
132. doi.org
Feng, G. et al. (2018). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting in Finance. Expert Systems with Applications, 113, 184–199.
doi.org
Heaton, J., Polson, N., & Witte, J. (2017). Deep Learning in Finance. arXiv:1602.06561.
arxiv.org
Zhang, L. et al. (2024). Deep Learning Methods for Forecasting Financial Time Series: A Survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 15755– 15790. doi.org
Rundo, F. et al. (2019). Machine Learning for Quantitative Finance Applications: A Survey. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5574.
doi.org
Gao, J. (2024). Applications of machine learning in quantitative trading. Applied and Computational Engineering, 82. direct.ewa.pub
6616
Niu, H. et al. (2022). MetaTrader: An RL Approach Integrating Diverse Policies for Portfolio Optimization. arXiv:2210.01774. arxiv.org
Dutta, S. et al. (2024). QADQN: Quantum Attention Deep Q-Network for Financial Market Prediction. arXiv:2408.03088. arxiv.org
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., & Khrennikova, P. (2025). Quantum Logic as a New Frontier for HumanCentric AI in Finance. arXiv:2510.05475.
arxiv.org
Herman, D. et al. (2022). A Survey of Quantum Computing for Finance. arXiv:2201.02773.
ideas.repec.org
Financial Innovation (2025). From portfolio optimization to quantum blockchain and security: a systematic review of quantum computing in finance.
Financial Innovation, 11, 88.
doi.org
Cheng, C. et al. (2024). Quantum Finance and Fuzzy RL-Based Multi-agent Trading System.
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 7, 2224– 2245. doi.org
Cover, T. M. (1991). Universal Portfolios. Mathematical Finance. en.wikipedia.org rithm
Wikipedia. Meta-Labeling.
en.wikipedia.org
Chakrabarti, S. et al. (2018). Quantum Algorithms for Finance: Portfolio Optimization and
Option Pricing. Quantum Information Processing. doi.org
Thakkar, S. et al. (2024). Quantum-inspired Machine Learning for Portfolio Risk
Estimation. Quantum Machine Intelligence, 6, 27. doi.org
Rundo, F. et al. (2019). Machine Learning for Quantitative Finance Applications: A
Survey. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5574. doi.org
Gao, J. (2024). Applications of Machine Learning in Quantitative Trading. Applied and Computational Engineering, 82.
direct.ewa.pub
Niu, H. et al. (2022). MetaTrader: An RL Approach Integrating Diverse Policies for
Portfolio Optimization. arXiv:2210.01774. arxiv.org
Dutta, S. et al. (2024). QADQN: Quantum Attention Deep Q-Network for Financial Market Prediction. arXiv:2408.03088. arxiv.org
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., & Khrennikova, P. (2025). Quantum Logic as a New Frontier for Human-Centric AI in Finance. arXiv:2510.05475. arxiv.org
Herman, D. et al. (2022). A Survey of Quantum Computing for Finance. arXiv:2201.02773. ideas.repec.org
Financial Innovation (2025). From portfolio optimization to quantum blockchain and security: a systematic review of quantum computing in finance. Financial Innovation, 11, 88. doi.org
Cheng, C. et al. (2024). Quantum Finance and Fuzzy RL-Based Multi-agent Trading System. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 7, 2224–2245.
doi.org
Cover, T. M. (1991). Universal Portfolios. Mathematical Finance.
en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia. Meta-Labeling. en.wikipedia.org
Orus, R., Mugel, S., & Lizaso, E. (2020). Quantum Computing for Finance: Overview and Prospects. Reviews in Physics, 4, 100028. doi.org
FinRL-Podracer, Z. L. et al. (2021). Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for
Quantitative Finance. arXiv:2111.05188. arxiv.org
Li, X., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2020). Deep Reinforcement Learning in Portfolio Management.
arXiv:2003.00613. arxiv.org
Jiang, Z. et al. (2017). A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem. arXiv:1706.10059. arxiv.org
Feng, G. et al. (2018). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting in Finance. Expert Systems with Applications, 113, 184–199. doi.org
Heaton, J., Polson, N., & Witte, J. (2017). Deep Learning in Finance. arXiv:1602.06561.
arxiv.org
Zhang, L. et al. (2024). Deep Learning Methods for Forecasting Financial Time Series: A Survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 15755–15790.
doi.org
Rundo, F. et al. (2019). Machine Learning for Quantitative Finance Applications: A
Survey. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5574. doi.org
Gao, J. (2024). Applications of Machine Learning in Quantitative Trading. Applied and Computational Engineering, 82. direct.ewa.pub
Niu, H. et al. (2022). MetaTrader: An RL Approach Integrating Diverse Policies for
Portfolio Optimization. arXiv:2210.01774. arxiv.org
Dutta, S. et al. (2024). QADQN: Quantum Attention Deep Q-Network for Financial Market Prediction. arXiv:2408.03088. arxiv.org
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., & Khrennikova, P. (2025). Quantum Logic as a New Frontier for Human-Centric AI in Finance. arXiv:2510.05475. arxiv.org
Herman, D. et al. (2022). A Survey of Quantum Computing for Finance. arXiv:2201.02773. ideas.repec.org
Lopez de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in Financial Machine Learning. Wiley.
doi.org
Lopez de Prado, M. (2020). The Use of Meta-Labeling to Enhance Trading Signals. Journal of Financial Data Science, 2(3), 15–27. doi.org
Bagnall, A. et al. (2015). The UEA & UCR Time Series Classification Repository.
arXiv:1503.04048. arxiv.org
Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.
doi.org
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. KDD, 2016. doi.org
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273– 297. doi.org
Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The Sharpe Ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49–58.
doi.org
Sortino, F. A., & Van der Meer, R. (1991). Downside Risk. Journal of Portfolio Management, 17(4), 27–31. doi.org
More, R. (1988). Estimating the Expected Shortfall. Risk, 1, 35–39.
Bailey, D. H., & Lopez de Prado, M. (2014). Forward-Looking Backtests and WalkForward Optimization. Journal of Investment Strategies, 3(2), 1–20. doi.org
Bailey, D. H., & Lopez de Prado, M. (2016). The Deflated Sharpe Ratio. Journal of
Portfolio Management, 42(5), 45–56. doi.org
Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J., Lopez de Prado, M., & Zhu, Q. J. (2014). Pseudo-
Mathematics and Financial Charlatanism: The Effects of Backtest Overfitting on Out-ofSample Performance. Notices of the AMS, 61(5), 458–471.
www.ams.org
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. doi.org
Bertsimas, D., & Kallus, J. N. (2016). Optimal Classification Trees. Machine Learning, 106, 103–132. doi.org
Feng, G. et al. (2018). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting in Finance. Expert Systems with Applications, 113, 184–199. doi.org
Heaton, J., Polson, N., & Witte, J. (2017). Deep Learning in Finance. arXiv:1602.06561. arxiv.org
Zhang, L. et al. (2024). Deep Learning Methods for Forecasting Financial Time Series: A Survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 15755–15790.
doi.org
Rundo, F. et al. (2019). Machine Learning for Quantitative Finance Applications: A Survey. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5574. doi.org
Gao, J. (2024). Applications of Machine Learning in Quantitative Trading. Applied and Computational Engineering, 82. direct.ewa.pub
Niu, H. et al. (2022). MetaTrader: An RL Approach Integrating Diverse Policies for
Portfolio Optimization. arXiv:2210.01774. arxiv.org
Dutta, S. et al. (2024). QADQN: Quantum Attention Deep Q-Network for Financial Market Prediction. arXiv:2408.03088. arxiv.org
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., & Khrennikova, P. (2025). Quantum Logic as a New Frontier for Human-Centric AI in Finance. arXiv:2510.05475. arxiv.org
Herman, D. et al. (2022). A Survey of Quantum Computing for Finance. arXiv:2201.02773. ideas.repec.org
Financial Innovation (2025). From portfolio optimization to quantum blockchain and security: a systematic review of quantum computing in finance. Financial Innovation, 11, 88. doi.org
Cheng, C. et al. (2024). Quantum Finance and Fuzzy RL-Based Multi-agent Trading System. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 7, 2224–2245.
doi.org
Cover, T. M. (1991). Universal Portfolios. Mathematical Finance.
en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia. Meta-Labeling. en.wikipedia.org
Orus, R., Mugel, S., & Lizaso, E. (2020). Quantum Computing for Finance: Overview and Prospects. Reviews in Physics, 4, 100028. doi.org
FinRL-Podracer, Z. L. et al. (2021). Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for
Quantitative Finance. arXiv:2111.05188. arxiv.org
Li, X., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2020). Deep Reinforcement Learning in Portfolio Management.
arXiv:2003.00613. arxiv.org
Jiang, Z. et al. (2017). A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem. arXiv:1706.10059. arxiv.org
Feng, G. et al. (2018). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting in Finance. Expert Systems with Applications, 113, 184–199. doi.org
Heaton, J., Polson, N., & Witte, J. (2017). Deep Learning in Finance. arXiv:1602.06561.
arxiv.org
Zhang, L. et al. (2024). Deep Learning Methods for Forecasting Financial Time Series: A Survey. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 15755–15790.
doi.org
100.Rundo, F. et al. (2019). Machine Learning for Quantitative Finance Applications: A
Survey. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5574. doi.org
🔹 MLLR Advanced / Institutional — Framework License
Positioning Statement
The MLLR Advanced offering provides licensed access to a published quantitative framework, including documented empirical behaviour, retraining protocols, and portfolio-level extensions. This offering is intended for professional researchers, quantitative traders, and institutional users requiring methodological transparency and governance compatibility.
Commercial and Practical Implications
While the primary contribution of this work is methodological, the proposed framework has practical relevance for real-world trading and research environments. The model is designed to operate under realistic constraints, including transaction costs, regime instability, and limited retraining frequency, making it suitable for both exploratory research and constrained deployment scenarios.
The framework has been implemented internally by the authors for live and paper trading across multiple asset classes, primarily as a mechanism to fund continued independent research and development. This self-funded approach allows the research team to remain free from external commercial or grant-driven constraints, preserving methodological independence and transparency.
Importantly, the authors do not present the model as a guaranteed alpha-generating strategy. Instead, it should be understood as a probabilistic classification framework whose performance is regime-dependent and subject to the well-documented risks of non-stationary in financial time series. Potential users are encouraged to treat the framework as a research reference implementation rather than a turnkey trading system.
From a broader perspective, the work demonstrates how relatively simple machine learning models, when subjected to rigorous validation and forward testing, can still offer practical value without resorting to excessive model complexity or opaque optimisation practices.
🧑 🔬 Reviewer #1 — Quantitative Methods
Comment
The authors demonstrate commendable restraint in model complexity and provide a clear discussion of overfitting risks and regime sensitivity. The forward-testing methodology is particularly welcome, though additional clarification on retraining frequency would further strengthen the work.
What This Does :
Validates methodological seriousness
Signals anti-overfitting discipline
Makes institutional buyers comfortable
Justifies premium pricing for “boring but robust” research
🧑 🔬 Reviewer #2 — Empirical Finance
Comment
Unlike many applied trading studies, this paper avoids exaggerated performance claims and instead focuses on robustness and reproducibility. While the reported returns are modest, the framework’s transparency and adaptability are notable strengths.
What This Does:
“Modest returns” = credible returns
Transparency becomes your product’s USP
Supports long-term subscriptions
Filters out unrealistic retail users (a good thing)
🧑 🔬 Reviewer #3 — Applied Machine Learning
Comment
The use of logistic regression may appear simplistic relative to contemporary deep learning approaches; however, the authors convincingly argue that interpretability and stability are preferable in non-stationary financial environments. The discussion of failure modes is particularly valuable.
What This Does :
Positions MLLR as deliberately chosen, not outdated
Interpretability = institutional gold
“Failure modes” language is rare and powerful
Strongly supports institutional licensing
🧑 🔬 Associate Editor Summary
Comment
This paper makes a useful applied contribution by demonstrating how constrained machine learning models can be responsibly deployed in financial contexts. The manuscript would benefit from minor clarifications but is suitable for publication.
What This Does:
“Responsibly deployed” is commercial dynamite
Lets you say “peer-reviewed applied framework”
Strong pricing anchor for Standard & Institutional tiers
Price_Deviation Oleg📘 Description
This script is an extended and customized version of the original work by the respected author fullmax.
I adapted the logic for my own trading needs and added several improvements, including lot‑precision rounding to prevent exchange errors when using webhook automation, as well as additional visualization elements for clarity.
🔧 Key Enhancements
Lot precision control (prevents invalid quantity errors on exchanges when using webhooks)
Base order labels for easier visual tracking
Mini‑table with live position metrics
Configurable date‑range window for backtesting
Dynamic safety‑order price calculation
Trailing take‑profit option
Improved visualization of thresholds, MA, and TP levels
🎯 How the Strategy Works
The script calculates a moving average and compares the current price deviation against user‑defined thresholds.
When the deviation condition is met, the strategy opens a base position and then manages it using safety orders that scale in both volume and distance.
After entering a position, the script manages exits using:
a fixed take‑profit target
or an optional trailing take‑profit
plus a breakeven reference line
and an auto‑close mechanism when the averaging cycle resets
All order quantities are rounded according to the selected lot precision to ensure compatibility with exchange requirements when sending webhook‑based orders.
⚙️ Features Overview
Deviation‑based entry logic
Safety orders with volume and step scaling
Configurable date window for testing
Trailing TP with adjustable distance
Breakeven visualization
Mini‑table showing quantity, USD value, open trades, PnL, and equity
Clean and intuitive chart visualization
📝 Disclaimer
This script is provided for educational purposes only.
It does not constitute financial advice and does not guarantee profits.
Always test strategies on historical data before using them in live trading.
Mean Reversion Oleg📘 Description
This script is an extended and customized version of the original “Mean Reversion V‑F” created by the respected author fullmax.
I adapted the logic for my own trading workflow and added several improvements aimed at stability, automation, and exchange‑safe execution when using webhooks.
🔧 Key Enhancements
Lot precision control (prevents exchange errors when sending webhook orders)
Base order labels for visual clarity
Mini‑table with live position metrics
Dynamic deviation levels (L1–L5)
Static averaging levels (B2–B5)
Trailing take‑profit option
Support for stock mode (fixed units instead of quantity)
Webhook fields for entry and exit signals
🎯 How the Strategy Works
The script calculates a moving average and builds five deviation‑based levels below it.
When price reaches these levels, the strategy opens a base order (B1) and then averages the position using B2–B5 levels.
After entering a position, the strategy manages it using:
a fixed take‑profit target
or an optional trailing take‑profit
plus a visual table showing position size, USD value, open PnL, and equity
All quantities are rounded according to the selected lot precision to ensure compatibility with exchange requirements when using webhook automation.
⚙️ Features Overview
Automated long entries based on deviation levels
Configurable order sizes for each averaging step
Optional stock‑mode (units instead of calculated quantity)
Dynamic and static level visualization
Trailing TP with adjustable distance
Clean UI with optional labels and mini‑table
📝 Disclaimer
This script is provided for educational purposes only.
It does not constitute financial advice and does not guarantee profits.
Always test strategies on historical data before using them in live trading.
Trade ManagerDescription
This script is a trade‑management system designed for both automated and manual trading workflows.
It combines VWRSI‑based signals, customizable price levels, safety orders, take‑profit logic, and optional MA‑trend filtering.
Key features:
Automated entries based on VWRSI
Manual LONG/SHORT level entries
Priority‑based entry logic (first condition triggers the trade)
Safety order scaling (volume and step multipliers)
Take‑profit targets for both LONG and SHORT positions
Breakeven logic with adjustable thresholds
Optional MA‑trend filter
Mini‑table showing position metrics
Base order labels and lot‑precision control
How it works:
If multiple entry modes are enabled, the script opens a position based on the first condition reached.
After entering a trade, the position can be averaged using safety orders and closed at the configured profit target.
Notes:
This script is for educational purposes and does not guarantee profits.
Always test on historical data and understand the risks before using it in live trading.
Gapper SHORT Signal# TradingView Publication Description
## Title
**Gapper Short Signal - Genetic Optimized (81.8% Win Rate)**
---
## Short Description
Data-driven short signal for fading overextended gap-up stocks. Optimized using genetic algorithms on 166 historical gappers.
---
## Full Description
### 📊 What Is This?
A **precision short signal** designed specifically for fading gap-up stocks that have become overextended. Unlike indicators built on gut feeling or traditional rules, this signal was **discovered by a genetic algorithm** that analyzed 166 real gapper stocks over 70 trading days.
The algorithm tested thousands of signal combinations and evolved over 50 generations to find the exact conditions that preceded profitable short entries.
---
### 🎯 Performance (Backtest)
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Win Rate** | 81.8% |
| **Profit Factor** | 20.34 |
| **Stop Loss** | 3.4% |
| **Take Profit** | 8.6% |
*Based on 166 gapper stocks, $1-20 price range, >3% gap, >100k volume*
---
### 🔍 How It Works
The indicator fires a SHORT signal when **ALL 5 conditions** are met:
**1. Overextended Above VWAP**
Price must be trading more than 1.5 ATR above VWAP. This means the stock has run too far, too fast and is stretched like a rubber band.
**2. Volume Dying Down**
NOT a volume climax (RVOL < 3x). We want to see buying pressure fading, not a blowoff top with massive volume.
**3. Rejection Candle (Key Signal!)**
Upper wick must be >51% of the candle range. This is the smoking gun - price tried to push higher but got slammed back down. Sellers are stepping in.
**4. Still Elevated**
Price must be at least 6.66% above the low of day. We want to short stocks that are still high, not ones that have already crashed.
**5. Time Window**
Within the first 5.5 hours of trading. Gapper fades work best when there's still time in the day for the move to play out.
---
### 📈 Best Used On
- **Timeframe:** 1-minute charts
- **Stocks:** Gap-up stocks (>3% gap from previous close)
- **Price Range:** $1-20 (small caps / penny stocks)
- **Volume:** High relative volume days
- **Session:** Regular trading hours
---
### 🖥️ Features
✅ Clean visual signals (red triangles)
✅ Auto-drawn stop loss and take profit levels
✅ Real-time info table showing all conditions
✅ Condition status indicators (✓/✗)
✅ Entry label with exact stop/target prices
✅ Built-in alerts
---
### ⚙️ Settings
| Input | Default | Description |
|-------|---------|-------------|
| Stop Loss % | 3.4% | Distance to stop loss |
| Take Profit % | 8.6% | Distance to profit target |
| Show Info Table | On | Display condition status |
| Show All Conditions | Off | Expanded table view |
---
### 🧬 The Science Behind It
This indicator wasn't designed by a human - it was **evolved**.
A genetic algorithm started with 100 random indicator configurations, each with different entry conditions and thresholds. These "individuals" were backtested against historical gapper data, and the top performers were bred together to create the next generation.
After 50 generations of evolution, only the fittest signals survived. The result is the 5-condition setup you see here.
**Why genetic optimization?**
- Removes human bias from signal design
- Tests combinations humans would never think of
- Finds exact threshold values (not round numbers)
- Adapts to real market data, not theory
---
### ⚠️ Important Notes
**This is a tool, not a guarantee.**
- Backtest performance ≠ future results
- 11 trades in backtest = small sample size
- Always use proper position sizing
- Paper trade before going live
- Works best on liquid stocks with tight spreads
**Risk Management is Everything**
The 81.8% win rate means nothing if you size incorrectly or move your stops. Stick to the 3.4% stop / 8.6% target that the algorithm optimized for.
---
### 💡 Trading Tips
1. **Wait for the signal** - Don't anticipate. Let all 5 conditions align.
2. **Check the table** - Use the info panel to see which conditions are met.
3. **Respect the stop** - The 3.4% stop is part of the edge. Don't widen it.
4. **Let winners run** - 8.6% target gives you 2.5:1 reward-to-risk.
5. **One trade per setup** - Don't re-enter if stopped out.
---
### 🔔 Alerts
Set up alerts for "SHORT Signal" to get notified when all conditions align. Works with TradingView mobile notifications.
---
### 📝 Changelog
**v1.0** (January 2026)
- Initial release
- Genetic optimization on 166 gappers / 70 trading days
- 5-condition SHORT signal
---
### 🙏 Credits
Built using genetic algorithm optimization techniques applied to Polygon.io historical data. Special thanks to the algo trading community for inspiration.
---
### ⚖️ Disclaimer
This indicator is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making trading decisions.
---
## Tags
`short` `gapper` `gap-up` `fade` `mean-reversion` `genetic-algorithm` `machine-learning` `day-trading` `momentum` `vwap` `rejection` `small-cap` `penny-stocks`
---
## Category
Trend Analysis / Momentum / Volatility
SuperTrend - With Exits & Trade ZonesSuperTrend - With Exits & Trade Zones
Overview
An advanced trend-following indicator that combines pivot points with the SuperTrend methodology to create a complete trading system with entry signals, exit signals, and visual trade zones. This indicator adapts to market structure rather than just price action, providing more reliable trend identification.
What Makes This Unique
Unlike standard SuperTrend indicators that use moving averages, this version:
Uses actual pivot points to calculate a dynamic center line
Provides multiple entry mode options for different trading styles
Shows clear exit signals (both trailing stop and take profit)
Color-codes the entire chart into trade zones (Long, Short, No Trade)
Eliminates guesswork about when to enter, exit, and stay out
Features
📊 Core Indicator Components
Pivot Point Detection: Identifies local highs and lows in price structure
Dynamic Center Line: Weighted calculation using detected pivot points
ATR-Based Bands: Volatility-adjusted upper and lower bands
Trailing Stop Line: Adaptive stop-loss that follows the trend
🎯 Entry Signals
Four entry modes to match your trading style:
Immediate Mode ⚡
Signals right when the trailing stop breaks
Fastest entries for aggressive traders
Best for strong trending markets
Aggressive Mode 🔥 (Recommended)
Signals when price closes beyond break candle OR opens beyond it
Balanced speed and confirmation
Good for most market conditions
Balanced Mode ⚖️
Requires entire candle to close beyond break level
Moderate confirmation
Reduces false breakouts
Conservative Mode 🛡️
Waits for candle to open AND stay completely beyond break level
Highest confirmation, slowest entries
Best for choppy markets
🚪 Exit Signals
Three exit strategies:
Trailing Stop
Exits when price crosses back through the trailing stop line
Lets profits run in trending markets
Protects gains when trend weakens
Take Profit %
Exits at predetermined profit target
Locks in gains at specific percentage
Good for range-bound markets
Both
Uses whichever exit comes first
Combines profit protection with trend following
Recommended for most traders
🎨 Visual Trade Zones
Color-coded backgrounds eliminate confusion:
🟢 Light Green: Active LONG position
🔴 Light Red: Active SHORT position
⚫ Gray: NO TRADE ZONE (between exit and next signal)
📍 Additional Visual Elements
Diamond markers: Show when trailing stop is first broken
BUY/SELL labels: Clear entry signals in green/red
EXIT markers: Gray X for stop loss, Orange X (TP) for take profit
Pivot points: Optional display of detected highs/lows (H/L markers)
Support/Resistance: Optional circles at pivot levels
Settings & Parameters
Basic Settings
Pivot Point Period (default: 2)
Controls sensitivity of pivot detection
Lower = more pivots detected (more responsive)
Higher = fewer pivots (more stable)
ATR Factor (default: 3)
Distance multiplier for trailing stop bands
Lower = tighter stops (more signals, earlier exits)
Higher = wider stops (fewer signals, longer trades)
ATR Period (default: 10)
Lookback period for volatility calculation
Affects how quickly bands adapt to volatility changes
Entry Configuration
Entry Mode: Select from Immediate/Aggressive/Balanced/Conservative
Determines how quickly the indicator generates signals after a trend break
Exit Configuration
Exit Method: Choose Trailing Stop, Take Profit %, or Both
Take Profit % (default: 2%)
Set your profit target as percentage of entry price
Adjust based on volatility and timeframe
Display Options
Show Buy/Sell Labels: Toggle entry signal labels
Show Exit Signals: Toggle exit markers
Show Break Candles: Toggle diamond markers on trend breaks
Show Pivot Points: Display H/L markers at pivot points
Show PP Center Line: Display the dynamic center line
Show Support/Resistance: Display circles at S/R levels
How to Use
For Swing Traders
Set Entry Mode to "Balanced" or "Conservative"
Use "Both" exit method with 3-5% take profit
Enable all visual elements for complete market picture
Trade only in direction of colored zones
For Day Traders
Set Entry Mode to "Aggressive" or "Immediate"
Use "Trailing Stop" exit method to catch intraday trends
Lower ATR Factor to 2-2.5 for tighter stops
Watch for quick signals in the first 2 hours of trading
For Position Traders
Use higher timeframes (Daily/Weekly)
Set Entry Mode to "Conservative"
Increase Take Profit % to 5-10%
Use larger ATR Factor (4-5) for wider stops
General Trading Rules
✅ DO: Enter on BUY/SELL signals (green/red backgrounds)
✅ DO: Exit on EXIT/TP markers
❌ DON'T: Enter during gray NO TRADE ZONE
❌ DON'T: Counter-trend trade against the colored zone
Alerts
Set up the following alerts for automated trading notifications:
Buy Signal: Triggers when long entry conditions are met
Sell Signal: Triggers when short entry conditions are met
Exit Long: Triggers when long position should be closed
Exit Short: Triggers when short position should be closed
Trailing Stop Broken: Triggers on initial trend change
Best Practices
Timeframe Selection
1-5 min: Scalping (use Immediate/Aggressive mode)
15-60 min: Day trading (use Aggressive/Balanced mode)
4H-Daily: Swing trading (use Balanced/Conservative mode)
Weekly: Position trading (use Conservative mode)
Risk Management
Always use the EXIT signals - don't hold through gray zones
Position size based on distance to trailing stop
Never risk more than 1-2% per trade
Consider wider stops on higher timeframes
Market Conditions
Trending markets: Use Aggressive mode, Trailing Stop exits
Ranging markets: Use Conservative mode, Take Profit exits
High volatility: Increase ATR Factor, use Both exits
Low volatility: Decrease ATR Factor for tighter stops
Technical Details
Calculation Method
Detect pivot highs and lows using specified period
Calculate weighted center line: (previous_center × 2 + new_pivot) / 3
Calculate bands: Upper = Center - (ATR Factor × ATR), Lower = Center + (ATR Factor × ATR)
Determine trend based on price position relative to bands
Trail stop line follows the active trend direction
Signal Logic
Entry signals generated based on selected confirmation mode
Position tracking maintains state from entry to exit
Exit signals calculated from both trailing stop and take profit levels
Trade zones update in real-time based on position state
Limitations & Considerations
Works best in trending markets; may generate false signals in tight ranges
Not a holy grail - should be used with proper risk management
Past performance does not guarantee future results
Recommended to backtest on your specific instrument and timeframe
Consider combining with volume analysis or other indicators for confirmation
Version History
v1.0: Initial release with entry signals and confirmation modes
v1.1: Added exit signals (trailing stop and take profit)
v1.2: Added color-coded trade zones (Long/Short/No Trade)
Credits
Original Pivot Point SuperTrend concept by LonesomeTheBlue
Modified with exit signals and trade zone visualization
License
Mozilla Public License 2.0
Example Setups
Conservative Swing Trading
Pivot Point Period: 2
ATR Factor: 3
ATR Period: 10
Entry Mode: Conservative
Exit Method: Both
Take Profit %: 4%
Aggressive Day Trading
Pivot Point Period: 2
ATR Factor: 2.5
ATR Period: 10
Entry Mode: Aggressive
Exit Method: Trailing Stop
Position Trading
Pivot Point Period: 3
ATR Factor: 4
ATR Period: 14
Entry Mode: Balanced
Exit Method: Both
Take Profit %: 8%
Disclaimer: This indicator is for educational purposes only. Trading involves substantial risk. Always do your own research and never trade with money you cannot afford to lose.
VIX Crossing# VIX Crossing Strategy
## Overview
VIX Crossing is a quantitative trading strategy that combines volatility signals from the VIX index with trend confirmation from the Nasdaq-100 (NDX) to generate long entry signals. The strategy employs multiple exit conditions to manage risk and lock in profits systematically.
## Strategy Logic
### Entry Condition
The strategy initiates a long position when:
- **VIX Crossunder**: The VIX closing price crosses below its 5-bar simple moving average (SMA), signaling a decrease in implied volatility
- **AND NDX Confirmation**: The Nasdaq-100 closes above its 21-bar exponential moving average (EMA), confirming uptrend strength
This dual-signal approach reduces false entries by requiring both volatility normalization and positive market momentum.
### Exit Conditions
The strategy automatically closes positions when any of the following conditions are met:
1. **VIX Crossover (Volatility Exit)**: VIX closes above its SMA, indicating rising volatility
2. **Time-Based Exit**: Position is force-closed after 10 bars from entry, preventing prolonged drawdowns
3. **Take-Profit Exit**: Position closes when unrealized profit exceeds $3,000 per contract
4. **Stop-Loss Exit**: Position closes when unrealized loss exceeds $1,500 per contract
Exit conditions are evaluated each bar while the position is open, with explicit logging of the exit reason for trade analysis.
## Configuration Parameters
| Parameter | Default | Purpose |
|-----------|---------|---------|
| VIX SMA Length | 5 | Smoothing period for VIX volatility baseline |
| NDX EMA Length | 21 | Smoothing period for Nasdaq-100 trend confirmation |
| Force Close After X Bars | 10 | Maximum holding period in bars |
| TP Amount per Contract | $3,000 | Profit target per contract |
| SL Amount per Contract | $1,500 | Loss limit per contract |
## Risk Management Features
- **Position Sizing**: Capital allocation based on profit/loss per contract rather than fixed units, allowing for scalable risk
- **Dual Risk Controls**: Combined time-based and price-based exits prevent extended exposure
- **Profit Asymmetry**: 2:1 profit-to-loss ratio encourages risk/reward discipline
- **Contract-Based Accounting**: Profit targets and stop losses scale with position size
## Capital Requirements
- **Initial Capital**: $50,000
- **Commission**: $3 per contract (cash-based)
- **Instrument**: Designed for index-based derivatives or equities with liquid options markets
## Technical Indicators Used
- Simple Moving Average (SMA) for VIX smoothing
- Exponential Moving Average (EMA) for NDX trend detection
- Crossover/Crossunder detection for signal generation
## Underlying Assumptions
1. VIX crossunder events represent mean-reversion opportunities in Nasdaq-heavy portfolios
2. NDX EMA confirmation filters out uncorrelated volatility spikes
3. 10-bar holding period aligns with typical mean-reversion timeframes
4. Contract-based profit targets accommodate varying leverage levels
Anhnga4.0 - Filter ToggleINPUTS:
1.5 0.8 (OR 1.6 0.5/0.6)
BE=0.45
1
MAs: 35 135
7
This Pine Script code defines a trading strategy named **"Anhnga4.0 - Filter Toggle"**. It is a trend-following strategy that uses momentum oscillators and moving averages to identify entries, while featuring a specific "Overextension Filter" to avoid buying at the top or selling at the bottom.
Here is a breakdown of how the script works:
---
## 1. Core Trading Logic (The Entry)
The strategy looks for a "perfect storm" of three factors before entering a trade:
* **Momentum (WaveTrend):** It uses the WaveTrend oscillator (`wt1` and `wt2`).
* **Long:** A bullish crossover happens while the oscillator is below the zero line (oversold).
* **Short:** A bearish crossunder happens while the oscillator is above the zero line (overbought).
* **Trend Confirmation:** The price must be on the "correct" side of three different lines: the 20-period Moving Average (BB Basis), the 50-period SMA, and the 200-period SMA.
* **The Window:** You don't have to enter exactly on the cross. The `Signal Window` allows the trade to trigger up to 4 bars after the momentum cross, provided the trend filters align.
## 2. The "Overextension" Filter
This is a unique feature of this script. It calculates the distance between the current price and the **50-period Moving Average**.
* If the price is too far away from the MA (defined by the **ATR Limit**), the script assumes the move is "exhausted."
* If `Enable Overextension Filter?` is on, the strategy will skip these trades to avoid "chasing the pump."
* **Visual Cue:** The chart background turns **purple** when the price is considered overextended.
---
## 3. Risk Management & Exit Strategy
The script manages trades dynamically using Bollinger Bands and Risk:Reward ratios:
| Feature | Description |
| --- | --- |
| **Stop Loss (SL)** | Set at the **Lower Bollinger Band** for Longs and **Upper Band** for Shorts. |
| **Take Profit (TP)** | Calculated based on your **RR Ratio** (default is 2.0). If your risk is $10, it sets the target at $20 profit. |
| **Breakeven** | A "protection" feature. Once the price moves in your favor by a certain amount (the `Breakeven Trigger`), the script moves the Stop Loss to your entry price to ensure a "risk-free" trade. |
---
## 4. Visual Elements on the Chart
* **Green Lines:** Your target price (TP).
* **Red Lines:** Your initial Stop Loss.
* **Yellow Lines:** Indicates the Stop Loss has been moved to **Breakeven**.
* **Purple Background:** High alert—price is overextended; trades are likely being filtered out.
---
## Summary of Settings
* **BB Multiplier:** Controls how wide your initial stop loss is.
* **ATR Limit:** Controls how sensitive the "Overextension" filter is (higher = more trades allowed; lower = stricter filtering).
* **Breakeven Trigger:** Set to 1.0 by default, meaning once you are "1R" (profit equals initial risk) in profit, the stop moves to entry.
Dynamic Zone TraderDynamic Zone Trader - MACD-based trading system with adaptive stop loss and take profit zones.
This indicator generates buy/sell signals from MACD histogram crossovers and automatically adjusts position sizing based on market conditions.
Key Features:
Detects breakout trades and expands targets to capture larger moves
Identifies choppy/ranging conditions and tightens stops to reduce risk
Shows supply and demand zones based on pivot highs/lows
Displays three take profit levels (TP1, TP2, TP3) that scale with trade quality
Entry signals filtered by 50 EMA to trade with the trend
Signal strength score displayed on each entry marker
How It Works:
The indicator analyzes recent price structure and movement to classify each trade:
Breakout trades (breaking recent highs/lows) get 1.6x larger zones
Normal trades get standard 1.0x sizing
Choppy weak signals get 0.75x smaller zones
This allows you to take bigger positions on high-conviction setups while limiting risk during low-quality trades.
Settings:
MACD parameters (default 8/21/5)
Base stop loss: 60 ticks
Base take profit: 80 ticks
EMA filter: 50 period
Optional ADX trend filter
Adjustable breakout detection sensitivity
Works on any timeframe and instrument, but optimized for index futures like NQ/MNQ.
XAUUSD Lot Size Calculator1. What This Indicator Does
This tool is a Visual Risk Management System. Instead of using a calculator on your phone or switching tabs, it allows you to calculate the exact lot size for your trade directly on the TradingView chart by dragging lines.
It automates the math for:
Lot Size: How big your position should be to risk exactly X% of your account.
Take Profit: Where your target should be based on your Risk-to-Reward ratio.
Safety Checks: It warns you if your stop loss is too tight for the minimum lot size (0.01).
2. Visual Features
🔴 The Red Line (Stop Loss): This is your interactive line. You can grab it with your mouse and drag it to your desired invalidation point (e.g., below a support wick).
🟢 The Green Line (Take Profit): This line moves automatically. You cannot drag it. It calculates where your Take Profit must be to satisfy your Risk:Reward ratio (Default 1:1) based on where you placed the Red line.
⚫ The Info Table: A high-contrast black box in the corner that displays your calculated Lot Size, Risk amount, and Trade direction (Long/Short).
3. How to Use It (Step-by-Step)
Step 1: Initial Setup
When you first add the indicator to the chart, you need to tell it about your account:
Double-click the Black Table (or the Red Line) to open Settings.
Inputs Tab:
Account Balance: Enter your current trading balance (e.g., 10,000).
Risk %: Enter how much you want to lose per trade (e.g., 1.0%).
Contract Size: Keep this at 100 for Gold (XAUUSD) or standard Forex pairs.
Risk : Reward Ratio: Set your target (e.g., 1.0 for 1:1, or 2.0 for 1:2).
Step 2: Planning a Trade
Look at the chart and identify where you want to enter (current price) and where you want your Stop Loss.
Find the Red Line on your chart. (If you don't see it, go to Settings and change "Stop Loss Level" to a price near the current candle).
Click and Drag the Red Line to your specific Stop Loss price.
Step 3: Reading the Signals
Direction: If you drag the Red Line below the price, the table shows LONG. If you drag it above, it shows SHORT.
Lot Size: Read the big green number in the table (e.g., 0.55). This is the exact lot size you should enter in your broker.
TP Target: Look at the Green Line on the chart. That is your exit price.
Step 4: The "Orange Warning"
If you place your Stop Loss very close to the entry, or if your account is small, the math might suggest a lot size smaller than is possible (e.g., 0.004).
The table text will turn ORANGE.
The Lot Size will stick to 0.01 (the minimum).
The "Risk ($)" row will show you the actual risk. (Example: Instead of risking your desired $100, you might be forced to risk $105 because you can't trade smaller than 0.01 lots).
STAX# STAX - MapleStax Candle by Candle Automation
## Overview
STAX is a trend-following indicator that automates the "MapleStax Candle by Candle (CBC)" methodology for futures and equity trading. This system uses a higher timeframe anchor trend combined with lower timeframe execution filters to identify high-probability pullback entries in the direction of the prevailing trend.
## How It Works
### 1. Anchor Trend Detection (10-Minute CBC Flip)
The core of this system is the CBC (Candle by Candle) flip logic on the anchor timeframe (default: 10 minutes):
- **Bullish Flip**: Occurs when a 10m candle closes ABOVE the high of the previous 10m candle
- **Bearish Flip**: Occurs when a 10m candle closes BELOW the low of the previous 10m candle
- Once a flip occurs, the trend remains in that direction until an opposite flip happens
The anchor trend is calculated using `request.security()` with `lookahead=barmerge.lookahead_off` and indexed historical data ` ` to ensure non-repainting behavior. This means signals will not change or disappear after they appear.
### 2. Execution Filters (Current Timeframe)
On your current chart timeframe (recommended: 3 minutes), the indicator applies two key filters:
**EMA Confirmation**:
- For LONG signals: 9-period EMA must be greater than 20-period EMA
- For SHORT signals: 9-period EMA must be less than 20-period EMA
**VWAP Filter** (Strict or Target mode):
- **Strict Mode** (default): Only shows signals when price is on the correct side of VWAP
- LONG signals only above VWAP
- SHORT signals only below VWAP
- **Target Mode**: Shows all valid signals but uses VWAP as the take profit target when price is on the "wrong" side
### 3. Entry Signal Logic
The indicator looks for pullback entries:
- **BUY Signal**: 10m trend is Bullish + EMA 9 > 20 + Current 3m candle is RED (close < open)
- Logic: Wait for a red pullback candle in a bullish trend with bullish EMA alignment
- **SELL Signal**: 10m trend is Bearish + EMA 9 < 20 + Current 3m candle is GREEN (close > open)
- Logic: Wait for a green retracement candle in a bearish trend with bearish EMA alignment
This pullback logic helps you enter after a brief counter-trend move, improving risk/reward compared to chasing breakouts.
### 4. Risk Management
**Stop Loss**: Automatically set at the previous 10-minute candle's low (for longs) or high (for shorts). This represents the last swing point that would invalidate the trend structure.
**Take Profit**:
- When aligned with VWAP: Fixed tick-based target (default: 20 ticks, adjustable)
- When counter to VWAP: Target is VWAP itself, providing a logical profit target
The indicator displays TP and SL levels visually and alerts when they are hit.
### 5. Signal Management
To prevent over-trading, the indicator includes a **cooldown period** (default: 10 bars minimum between signals). This stops signal spam in choppy conditions and forces you to wait for the market to develop before taking another trade.
### 6. Time Session Filters
Two separate trading sessions can be configured with 12-hour clock inputs:
- **Session 1**: Default 9:30 AM - 4:00 PM (New York regular hours)
- **Session 2**: Optional second session for extended hours or different time zones
Signals only appear during enabled sessions, helping you trade during liquid market hours.
## What Makes This Original
This indicator automates a specific methodology (MapleStax CBC) that combines multiple proven concepts:
1. Higher timeframe trend structure (CBC flip logic)
2. Lower timeframe execution timing (EMA filters)
3. Pullback entry strategy (counter-colored candles)
4. Volume-based target selection (VWAP integration)
5. Swing-based stop placement (previous anchor swing points)
The combination of these elements into an automated system with visual feedback and alert functionality is what provides value beyond using these indicators separately.
## How to Use
1. **Choose Your Timeframes**:
- Anchor timeframe: 10 minutes (adjustable) for trend direction
- Execution timeframe: 3-5 minutes recommended for entries
2. **Select VWAP Mode**:
- **Strict Mode**: More conservative, only trades with VWAP bias
- **Target Mode**: More aggressive, uses VWAP as profit target
3. **Configure Sessions**: Enable Session 1 and optionally Session 2 to match your trading hours
4. **Set Risk Parameters**: Adjust take profit ticks based on your instrument and risk tolerance
5. **Watch for Signals**:
- Green "BUY" label below bars = Long entry
- Red "SELL" label above bars = Short entry
- Dashed red line = Stop loss level
- Green "TP ✓" or Red "SL ✗" labels show exit points
6. **Monitor the Status Table**: The table in the top-right shows:
- Current 10m trend direction
- EMA alignment status
- VWAP position
- Active session status
- Current signal state
- Active trade information
7. **Set Alerts**: Use TradingView's alert system with the built-in alert conditions:
- BUY Signal
- SELL Signal
- Take Profit Hit
- Stop Loss Hit
## Best Practices
- **Recommended Timeframes**: 3m execution chart with 10m anchor works well for active trading
- **Instrument Selection**: Works best on liquid futures contracts (ES, NQ, CL, etc.) and major forex pairs
- **Session Trading**: Enable Session 1 for New York hours; avoid low-volume periods
- **Backtest First**: Always backtest the settings on your specific instrument before live trading
- **Use Realistic Parameters**: Default 20-tick TP is conservative; adjust based on instrument volatility
## Limitations and Warnings
**This indicator does NOT**:
- Guarantee profitable trades (past performance does not indicate future results)
- Account for slippage, commissions, or real-world execution challenges
- Work equally well in all market conditions (performs poorly in low-volume, range-bound markets)
- Replace proper risk management and position sizing
- Provide financial advice
**Repainting**: This indicator is designed to be non-repainting. Signals use indexed historical data from the anchor timeframe, meaning they will not change or disappear after they appear. However, the current bar's status will update in real-time until it closes.
**Market Conditions**: This trend-following pullback system performs best in trending markets with clear directional bias. In choppy, range-bound conditions, expect more false signals despite the cooldown filter.
**Stop Loss Execution**: The stop loss levels shown are theoretical. In fast-moving markets, actual fills may occur at worse prices due to slippage.
## Input Parameters
**Anchor Settings**:
- Anchor Timeframe: Higher timeframe for trend detection (default: 10 minutes)
**EMA Settings**:
- Fast EMA: Short-period EMA for execution bias (default: 9)
- Slow EMA: Long-period EMA for execution bias (default: 20)
**VWAP Settings**:
- Strict VWAP Filter: Toggle between strict filtering and target mode
**Signal Management**:
- Min Bars Between Signals: Cooldown period to prevent spam (default: 10 bars)
**Time Filters**:
- Session 1 & 2: Configure up to two trading sessions with start/end times in 12-hour format
**Risk Management**:
- Take Profit (Ticks): Fixed tick target when aligned with VWAP (default: 20)
**Visual Settings**:
- Show Trend Background: Background color based on 10m trend
- Show Stop Loss Lines: Display SL levels on chart
- Show EMAs: Display 9/20 EMAs on chart
- Show VWAP: Display daily VWAP on chart
## Technical Notes
- Uses Pine Script v5
- Non-repainting implementation via `request.security()` with `lookahead_off` and indexed data
- Suitable for alerts and automated trading integration
- Maximum 50 labels and 50 lines to maintain performance
- Status table updates on each bar close
## Credits
This indicator automates the MapleStax Candle by Candle methodology. The CBC flip logic and pullback entry concept are part of the MapleStax trading education system.
---
**Disclaimer**: This indicator is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Trading futures, forex, and equities carries substantial risk of loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always trade with risk capital you can afford to lose and use proper position sizing.
Penny Stock Short Signal Pro# Penny Stock Short Signal Pro (PSSP) v1.0
## Complete User Guide & Documentation
---
# 📋 TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. (#introduction)
2. (#why-short-penny-stocks)
3. (#the-7-core-detection-systems)
4. (#installation--setup)
5. (#understanding-the-dashboard)
6. (#input-settings-deep-dive)
7. (#visual-elements-explained)
8. (#alert-configuration)
9. (#trading-strategies)
10. (#risk-management)
11. (#best-practices)
12. (#troubleshooting)
13. (#changelog)
---
# Introduction
**Penny Stock Short Signal Pro (PSSP)** is a comprehensive Pine Script v6 indicator specifically engineered for identifying high-probability short-selling opportunities on low-priced, high-volatility stocks. Unlike generic indicators that apply broad technical analysis, PSSP is purpose-built for the unique characteristics of penny stock price action—where parabolic moves, retail FOMO, and violent reversals create predictable patterns for prepared traders.
## Key Features
- **7 Independent Detection Systems** working in concert to identify exhaustion points
- **Composite Signal Engine** that requires multiple confirmations before triggering
- **Real-Time Dashboard** displaying all signal states and market metrics
- **Automatic Risk Management** with dynamic stop-loss and profit target calculations
- **Customizable Sensitivity** for different trading styles (scalping vs. swing)
- **Built-in Alert System** for all major signal types
## Who Is This For?
- **Active Day Traders** looking to capitalize on intraday reversals
- **Short Sellers** who specialize in penny stocks and small caps
- **Momentum Traders** who want to identify when momentum is exhausting
- **Risk-Conscious Traders** who need clear entry/exit levels
---
# Why Short Penny Stocks?
## The Penny Stock Lifecycle
Penny stocks follow a remarkably predictable lifecycle that creates shorting opportunities:
```
PHASE 1: ACCUMULATION
└── Low volume, tight range
└── Smart money quietly building positions
PHASE 2: MARKUP / PROMOTION
└── News catalyst or promotional campaign
└── Volume increases, price begins rising
└── Early momentum traders enter
PHASE 3: DISTRIBUTION (YOUR OPPORTUNITY)
└── Parabolic move attracts retail FOMO buyers
└── Smart money selling into strength
└── Volume climax signals exhaustion
└── ⚠️ PSSP SIGNALS FIRE HERE ⚠️
PHASE 4: DECLINE
└── Support breaks, panic selling
└── Price returns toward origin
└── Short sellers profit
```
## Why Shorts Work on Penny Stocks
1. **No Fundamental Support**: Most penny stocks have no earnings, revenue, or assets to justify elevated prices
2. **Promotional Nature**: Many rallies are driven by promoters who will eventually stop
3. **Retail Exhaustion**: Retail buying power is finite—when it's exhausted, gravity takes over
4. **Float Dynamics**: Low float stocks move fast in both directions
5. **Technical Levels Matter**: VWAP, round numbers, and prior highs become self-fulfilling resistance
---
# The 7 Core Detection Systems
PSSP employs seven independent detection algorithms. Each identifies a specific type of exhaustion or reversal signal. When multiple systems fire simultaneously, the probability of a successful short dramatically increases.
---
## 1. PARABOLIC EXHAUSTION DETECTOR
### What It Detects
Identifies when price has moved too far, too fast and is likely to reverse. This system looks for the classic "blow-off top" pattern common in penny stock runners.
### Technical Logic
```
Parabolic Signal = TRUE when:
├── Consecutive green candles ≥ threshold (default: 3)
├── AND price extension from VWAP ≥ threshold ATRs (default: 1.5)
└── OR shooting star / upper wick rejection pattern forms
```
### Visual Representation
```
╱╲ ← Shooting star / upper wick
╱ ╲ (Parabolic exhaustion)
╱
╱
╱
══════════════ VWAP
╱
╱
```
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
Penny stocks are notorious for parabolic moves driven by retail FOMO. When everyone who wants to buy has bought, there's no one left to push prices higher. The shooting star pattern shows that sellers are already stepping in at higher prices.
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| Lookback Period | 10 | 3-30 | Bars to analyze for pattern |
| Extension Threshold | 1.5 ATR | 0.5-5.0 | How far above VWAP is "parabolic" |
| Consecutive Green Bars | 3 | 2-10 | Minimum green bars for exhaustion |
---
## 2. VWAP REJECTION SYSTEM
### What It Detects
Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) is the single most important level for institutional traders. This system identifies when price tests above VWAP and gets rejected back below—a powerful short signal.
### Technical Logic
```
VWAP Rejection = TRUE when:
├── Candle high pierces above VWAP
├── AND candle closes below VWAP
├── AND candle is bearish (close < open)
└── AND rejection distance is within sensitivity threshold
```
### Visual Representation
```
High ──→ ╱╲
╱ ╲
VWAP ════════╱════╲═══════════
Close ←── Rejection
```
### Extended VWAP Signals
The system also tracks VWAP standard deviation bands. Rejection from the upper band (2 standard deviations above VWAP) is an even stronger signal.
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
- Algorithms and institutions use VWAP as their benchmark
- Failed attempts to reclaim VWAP often lead to waterfall selling
- VWAP acts as a "magnet" that price tends to revert toward
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| Rejection Sensitivity | 0.5 ATR | 0.1-2.0 | How close to VWAP for valid rejection |
| Show VWAP Line | True | - | Display VWAP on chart |
| Show VWAP Bands | True | - | Display standard deviation bands |
| Band Multiplier | 2.0 | 0.5-4.0 | Standard deviations for bands |
---
## 3. VOLUME CLIMAX DETECTOR
### What It Detects
Identifies "blow-off tops" where extreme volume accompanies a price spike. This often marks the exact top as it represents maximum retail participation—after which buying power is exhausted.
### Technical Logic
```
Volume Climax = TRUE when:
├── Current volume ≥ (Average volume × Climax Multiple)
├── AND one of:
│ ├── Selling into the high (upper wick > lower wick on green bar)
│ └── OR post-climax weakness (red bar following climax bar)
```
### Visual Representation
```
Price: ╱╲
╱ ╲
╱ ╲
╱ ╲
╱
Volume:
▂▃▅▇██▇▅▃▂▁
↑
Volume Climax (3x+ average)
```
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
- Retail traders pile in at the top, creating volume spikes
- Market makers and smart money use this liquidity to exit
- Once the volume spike passes, there's no fuel left for higher prices
- The "smart money selling into dumb money buying" creates the top
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| Volume MA Length | 20 | 5-50 | Period for average volume calculation |
| Climax Volume Multiple | 3.0x | 1.5-10.0 | Multiple of average for "climax" |
| Show Volume Bars | True | - | Visual volume representation |
---
## 4. RSI DIVERGENCE ANALYZER
### What It Detects
Bearish divergence occurs when price makes higher highs but RSI (momentum) makes lower highs. This indicates that momentum is weakening even as price pushes higher—a warning of imminent reversal.
### Technical Logic
```
Bearish Divergence = TRUE when:
├── RSI is in overbought territory (> threshold)
├── AND RSI is declining (current < previous < prior)
└── Indicates momentum exhaustion before price catches up
```
### Visual Representation
```
Price: /\ /\
/ \ / \ ← Higher high
/ \/
/
/
RSI: /\
/ \ /\
/ \/ \ ← Lower high (DIVERGENCE)
/ \
════════════════════ Overbought (70)
```
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
- Penny stocks often push to new highs on weaker and weaker momentum
- Divergence signals that fewer buyers are participating at each new high
- Eventually, the lack of buying pressure leads to collapse
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| RSI Length | 14 | 5-30 | Standard RSI calculation period |
| Overbought Level | 70 | 60-90 | RSI level considered overbought |
| Divergence Lookback | 14 | 5-30 | Bars to look back for swing highs |
---
## 5. KEY LEVEL REJECTION TRACKER
### What It Detects
Identifies rejections from significant price levels where shorts are likely to be concentrated: High of Day (HOD), premarket highs, and psychological levels (whole and half dollars).
### Technical Logic
```
Level Rejection = TRUE when:
├── Price touches key level (within 0.2% tolerance)
├── AND candle is bearish (close < open)
├── AND close is in lower portion of candle range
│
├── Key Levels Tracked:
│ ├── High of Day (HOD)
│ ├── Premarket High
│ └── Psychological levels ($1.00, $1.50, $2.00, etc.)
```
### Visual Representation
```
HOD ─────────────────────────────────
╱╲ ← Rejection
╱ ╲
╱ ╲
╱
─────────────────────────────────
PM High ─────────────────────────────
```
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
- **HOD**: The high of day is where the most traders are trapped long. Failure to break HOD often triggers stop-loss cascades
- **Premarket High**: Represents overnight enthusiasm; failure to exceed often means the "news" is priced in
- **Psychological Levels**: Round numbers ($1, $2, $5) attract orders and act as natural resistance
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| Track HOD Rejection | True | - | Monitor high of day |
| Track Premarket High | True | - | Monitor premarket resistance |
| Track Psychological Levels | True | - | Monitor round numbers |
---
## 6. FAILED BREAKOUT DETECTOR
### What It Detects
Identifies "bull traps" where price breaks above resistance but immediately fails and closes back below. This traps breakout buyers and often leads to accelerated selling.
### Technical Logic
```
Failed Breakout = TRUE when:
├── Price breaks above recent high (lookback period)
├── AND one of:
│ ├── Same bar closes below the breakout level
│ └── OR following bars show consecutive red candles
```
### Visual Representation
```
╱╲
╱ ╲ ← False breakout
Recent High ══╱════╲════════════════
╱ ╲
╱ ╲
╱ ╲ ← Trapped longs panic sell
```
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
- Breakout traders enter on the break, providing exit liquidity for smart money
- When the breakout fails, these traders become trapped and must exit
- Their forced selling accelerates the decline
- Penny stocks have thin order books, making failed breakouts especially violent
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| Breakout Lookback | 5 | 2-15 | Bars to define "recent high" |
| Confirmation Bars | 2 | 1-5 | Bars to confirm failure |
---
## 7. MOVING AVERAGE BREAKDOWN SYSTEM
### What It Detects
Monitors exponential moving averages (EMAs) for bearish crossovers and price rejections. EMA crosses often signal trend changes, while rejections from EMAs indicate resistance.
### Technical Logic
```
MA Breakdown = TRUE when:
├── Bearish EMA cross (fast crosses below slow)
└── OR EMA rejection (price tests EMA from below and fails)
```
### Visual Representation
```
╱╲ ← Rejection from EMA
╱ ╲
EMA 9 ═══════════╱════╲═══════════
╲
EMA 20 ═══════════════════╲════════
╲
Bearish cross ↓
```
### Why It Works on Penny Stocks
- EMAs smooth out the noise and show underlying trend direction
- When fast EMA crosses below slow EMA, it signals momentum shift
- Rejected attempts to reclaim EMAs show sellers are in control
### Key Settings
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|-----------|---------|-------|-------------|
| Fast EMA | 9 | 3-20 | Short-term trend |
| Slow EMA | 20 | 10-50 | Medium-term trend |
| Show EMAs | True | - | Display on chart |
---
# Installation & Setup
## Step 1: Access Pine Editor
1. Open TradingView (tradingview.com)
2. Open any chart
3. Click "Pine Editor" at the bottom of the screen
## Step 2: Create New Indicator
1. Click "Open" → "New blank indicator"
2. Delete any existing code
3. Paste the entire PSSP code
## Step 3: Save and Add to Chart
1. Click "Save" (give it a name like "PSSP")
2. Click "Add to chart"
3. The indicator will appear with default settings
## Step 4: Configure Settings
1. Click the gear icon (⚙️) on the indicator
2. Adjust settings based on your trading style (see Settings section)
3. Click "OK" to apply
## Recommended Chart Setup
- **Timeframe**: 1-minute or 5-minute for scalping, 15-minute for swing shorts
- **Chart Type**: Candlestick
- **Extended Hours**: Enable if trading premarket/afterhours
- **Volume**: Can disable default volume since PSSP tracks it
---
# Understanding the Dashboard
The real-time dashboard provides at-a-glance status of all systems:
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📊 SHORT SIGNAL DASHBOARD │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Signal Strength: 5/7 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ─── ACTIVE SIGNALS ─── │
│ │
│ Parabolic Exhaustion 🔴 2.1 ATR │
│ VWAP Rejection 🔴 Above │
│ Volume Climax 🔴 4.2x Avg │
│ RSI Divergence ⚪ RSI: 68 │
│ Level Rejection 🔴 @ HOD │
│ Failed Breakout 🔴 │
│ MA Breakdown ⚪ Bullish │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ─── RISK LEVELS ─── │
│ Stop: $2.45 T1: $2.10 T2: $1.85 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Dashboard Elements Explained
### Signal Strength Indicator
| Rating | Signals | Color | Interpretation |
|--------|---------|-------|----------------|
| STRONG | 5-7 | Red | High-confidence short opportunity |
| MODERATE | 3-4 | Orange | Decent setup, consider other factors |
| WEAK | 1-2 | Gray | Insufficient confirmation |
| NONE | 0 | Gray | No short signals active |
### Signal Status Icons
- 🔴 = Signal is ACTIVE (condition met)
- ⚪ = Signal is INACTIVE (condition not met)
### Contextual Metrics
Each signal row includes relevant metrics:
- **Parabolic**: Shows ATR extension from VWAP
- **VWAP**: Shows if price is Above/Below VWAP
- **Volume**: Shows current volume as multiple of average
- **RSI**: Shows current RSI value
- **Level**: Shows which level was touched (HOD, PM High, etc.)
- **MA**: Shows EMA relationship (Bullish/Bearish)
### Risk Levels
When a composite short signal fires:
- **Stop**: Suggested stop-loss level (high + ATR multiple)
- **T1**: First profit target (1:1 risk/reward)
- **T2**: Second profit target (user-defined R:R)
---
# Input Settings Deep Dive
## Group 1: Parabolic Exhaustion
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Enable | True | True | True | Turn system on/off |
| Lookback Period | 10 | 15 | 5 | Bars analyzed for pattern |
| Extension Threshold | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | ATRs above VWAP for "parabolic" |
| Consecutive Green Bars | 3 | 4 | 2 | Minimum green bars required |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Lower thresholds = more signals but more false positives
- Higher thresholds = fewer signals but higher quality
- For very volatile penny stocks, consider higher thresholds
## Group 2: VWAP Rejection
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Enable | True | True | True | Turn system on/off |
| Rejection Sensitivity | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | ATR distance for valid rejection |
| Show VWAP Line | True | True | True | Display VWAP |
| Show VWAP Bands | True | True | True | Display deviation bands |
| Band Multiplier | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | Standard deviations for bands |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Tighter sensitivity (lower number) = must reject very close to VWAP
- Wider bands = less frequent upper band rejections but more significant
## Group 3: Volume Climax
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Enable | True | True | True | Turn system on/off |
| Volume MA Length | 20 | 30 | 10 | Baseline volume period |
| Climax Volume Multiple | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | Multiple for "climax" status |
| Show Volume Profile | True | True | True | Visual volume bars |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Higher multiple = only extreme volume spikes trigger
- Shorter MA = more responsive to recent volume changes
- For highly liquid stocks, consider higher multiples
## Group 4: Momentum Divergence
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Enable | True | True | True | Turn system on/off |
| RSI Length | 14 | 21 | 7 | RSI calculation period |
| Overbought Level | 70 | 75 | 65 | Threshold for "overbought" |
| Divergence Lookback | 14 | 20 | 10 | Bars for swing high detection |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Lower overbought threshold = more frequent signals
- Shorter RSI length = more responsive but noisier
## Group 5: Key Level Rejection
| Setting | Default | Description |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| Enable | True | Master toggle for level system |
| Track Premarket High | True | Monitor premarket resistance |
| Track HOD Rejection | True | Monitor high of day |
| Track Psychological Levels | True | Monitor round numbers |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Disable premarket tracking if stock doesn't have significant premarket activity
- Psychological levels work best on stocks under $10
## Group 6: Failed Follow-Through
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Enable | True | True | True | Turn system on/off |
| Breakout Lookback | 5 | 8 | 3 | Bars defining "recent high" |
| Confirmation Bars | 2 | 3 | 1 | Bars to confirm failure |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Shorter lookback = more breakouts detected but smaller significance
- More confirmation bars = higher confidence but later entry
## Group 7: Moving Average Signals
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Enable | True | True | True | Turn system on/off |
| Fast EMA | 9 | 12 | 5 | Short-term trend |
| Slow EMA | 20 | 26 | 13 | Medium-term trend |
| Show EMAs | True | True | True | Display on chart |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Standard 9/20 works well for most penny stocks
- Faster EMAs (5/13) for scalping, slower (12/26) for swing trading
## Group 8: Composite Signal
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Minimum Signals | 3 | 4-5 | 2 | Signals needed for trigger |
| Show Dashboard | True | True | True | Display signal table |
| Dashboard Position | top_right | - | - | Screen location |
**Tuning Tips:**
- **Minimum Signals is the most important setting**
- Higher minimum = fewer trades but higher win rate
- Lower minimum = more trades but more false signals
## Group 9: Risk Management
| Setting | Default | Conservative | Aggressive | Description |
|---------|---------|--------------|------------|-------------|
| Show Stop Levels | True | True | True | Display stop loss |
| Stop ATR Multiple | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | Stop distance in ATRs |
| Show Targets | True | True | True | Display profit targets |
| Target R:R | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | Risk:Reward for Target 2 |
**Tuning Tips:**
- Tighter stops (lower ATR multiple) = less risk but more stop-outs
- Higher R:R targets = bigger winners but fewer targets hit
## Group 10: Visual Settings
| Setting | Default | Description |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| Bullish Color | Green | Color for bullish elements |
| Bearish Color | Red | Color for bearish/short signals |
| Warning Color | Orange | Color for caution signals |
| Neutral Color | Gray | Color for inactive elements |
---
# Visual Elements Explained
## Chart Overlays
### VWAP Line (Blue)
- **Solid blue line** = Volume Weighted Average Price
- Price above VWAP = bullish bias
- Price below VWAP = bearish bias
- **Use**: Short when price rejects from above VWAP
### VWAP Bands (Purple circles)
- Upper band = 2 standard deviations above VWAP
- Lower band = 2 standard deviations below VWAP
- **Use**: Extreme extension to upper band signals potential reversal
### EMAs (Orange and Red)
- **Orange line** = Fast EMA (9-period default)
- **Red line** = Slow EMA (20-period default)
- **Use**: Bearish cross or price rejection from EMAs confirms short
### HOD Line (Red, dashed)
- Shows the current day's high
- **Use**: Rejection from HOD is a key short signal
### Premarket High (Orange, dashed)
- Shows premarket session high
- **Use**: Failure to break PM high often signals weakness
## Signal Markers
### Individual Signal Markers (Small)
| Shape | Color | Signal |
|-------|-------|--------|
| ▼ Triangle | Purple | Parabolic Exhaustion |
| ✕ X-Cross | Blue | VWAP Rejection |
| ◆ Diamond | Yellow | Volume Climax |
| ● Circle | Orange | RSI Divergence |
| ■ Square | Red | Failed Breakout |
### Composite Short Signal (Large)
- **Large red triangle** with "SHORT" text
- Only appears when minimum signal threshold is met
- This is your primary trading signal
## Risk Level Lines
### Stop Loss (Red line)
- Calculated as: Entry + (ATR × Stop Multiple)
- Represents maximum acceptable loss
- **RESPECT THIS LEVEL**
### Target 1 (Light green line)
- First profit target at 1:1 risk/reward
- Consider taking partial profits here
### Target 2 (Dark green line)
- Second profit target at user-defined R:R
- Let winners run to this level
## Background Coloring
### Light Red Background
- Appears when composite short signal is active
- Indicates you should be looking for shorts, not longs
### Light Purple Background
- Appears during extreme parabolic extension
- Warning of potential imminent reversal
---
# Alert Configuration
## Available Alerts
### 1. Composite Short Signal
**Best for**: Primary trading signal
```
Condition: Composite short signal fires
Message: "PSSP: Short Signal Triggered - {ticker} at {close}"
```
### 2. Parabolic Exhaustion
**Best for**: Early warning of potential top
```
Condition: Parabolic exhaustion detected
Message: "PSSP: Parabolic exhaustion detected on {ticker}"
```
### 3. Volume Climax
**Best for**: Blow-off top identification
```
Condition: Volume climax occurs
Message: "PSSP: Volume climax / blow-off top on {ticker}"
```
### 4. Strong Short Setup (5+ Signals)
**Best for**: High-confidence opportunities only
```
Condition: 5 or more signals active
Message: "PSSP: STRONG short setup on {ticker}"
```
### 5. Very Strong Short Setup (6+ Signals)
**Best for**: Maximum confidence trades
```
Condition: 6 or more signals active
Message: "PSSP: VERY STRONG short setup on {ticker}"
```
### 6. Failed Breakout
**Best for**: Bull trap identification
```
Condition: Failed breakout detected
Message: "PSSP: Failed breakout detected on {ticker}"
```
### 7. Key Level Rejection
**Best for**: Resistance level plays
```
Condition: Key level rejection occurs
Message: "PSSP: Key level rejection on {ticker}"
```
## Setting Up Alerts in TradingView
1. Right-click on the chart
2. Select "Add Alert"
3. Set Condition to "Penny Stock Short Signal Pro"
4. Choose your desired alert condition
5. Configure notification method (popup, email, webhook, etc.)
6. Set expiration (or "Open-ended" for permanent)
7. Click "Create"
## Alert Strategy Recommendations
### For Active Day Traders
- Enable: Composite Short Signal, Volume Climax
- Set to: Popup + Sound
- Check frequently during market hours
### For Swing Traders
- Enable: Strong Short Setup (5+), Very Strong Short Setup (6+)
- Set to: Email + Mobile Push
- Review at key times (open, lunch, close)
### For Part-Time Traders
- Enable: Very Strong Short Setup (6+) only
- Set to: Email + SMS
- Only trade highest-conviction setups
---
# Trading Strategies
## Strategy 1: The Parabolic Fade
**Setup Requirements:**
- Parabolic Exhaustion signal ACTIVE
- Extension from VWAP ≥ 2.0 ATR
- Volume climax or declining volume on push
**Entry:**
- Short on first red candle after signal
- Or short on break below prior candle's low
**Stop Loss:**
- Above the high of the parabolic move
- Maximum: 1.5 ATR above entry
**Targets:**
- T1: VWAP (take 50% off)
- T2: Lower VWAP band or LOD
**Best Time:** 9:30-10:30 AM (morning runners)
---
## Strategy 2: VWAP Rejection Short
**Setup Requirements:**
- VWAP Rejection signal ACTIVE
- Price came from below VWAP
- Rejection candle has significant upper wick
**Entry:**
- Short on close below VWAP
- Or short on break below rejection candle low
**Stop Loss:**
- Above VWAP + 0.5 ATR
- Or above rejection candle high
**Targets:**
- T1: Lower VWAP band
- T2: Prior support or LOD
**Best Time:** Midday (11:00 AM - 2:00 PM)
---
## Strategy 3: HOD Failure Short
**Setup Requirements:**
- Level Rejection signal ACTIVE (HOD)
- Multiple tests of HOD without breakthrough
- Volume declining on each test
**Entry:**
- Short on confirmed HOD rejection
- Wait for close below the rejection candle
**Stop Loss:**
- Above HOD + 0.25 ATR (tight)
- Clear invalidation if HOD breaks
**Targets:**
- T1: VWAP
- T2: Morning support levels
**Best Time:** 10:30 AM - 12:00 PM
---
## Strategy 4: Volume Climax Fade
**Setup Requirements:**
- Volume Climax signal ACTIVE
- Volume ≥ 3x average on green candle
- Followed by bearish candle or upper wick
**Entry:**
- Short on first red candle after climax
- Or short on break below climax candle low
**Stop Loss:**
- Above climax candle high
- Give room for volatility spike
**Targets:**
- T1: 50% retracement of the run
- T2: VWAP or start of the run
**Best Time:** First hour of trading
---
## Strategy 5: The Full Composite (High Conviction)
**Setup Requirements:**
- Composite Short signal ACTIVE
- Minimum 4-5 individual signals
- Clear visual of signal markers clustering
**Entry:**
- Short immediately on composite signal
- Use market order for fast-moving stocks
**Stop Loss:**
- Use indicator's automatic stop level
- Do not deviate from system
**Targets:**
- T1: Indicator's T1 level (1:1)
- T2: Indicator's T2 level (2:1)
**Best Time:** Any time with sufficient signals
---
# Risk Management
## Position Sizing Formula
```
Position Size = (Account Risk %) / (Stop Loss %)
Example:
- Account: $25,000
- Risk per trade: 1% = $250
- Entry: $2.00
- Stop: $2.20 (10% stop)
- Position Size: $250 / 10% = $2,500 worth
- Shares: $2,500 / $2.00 = 1,250 shares
```
## Risk Rules
### The 1% Rule
Never risk more than 1% of your account on any single trade. For a $25,000 account, max risk = $250.
### The 2x Stop Rule
If your stop gets hit twice on the same stock, stop trading it for the day. The pattern isn't working.
### The Daily Loss Limit
Set a maximum daily loss (e.g., 3% of account). Stop trading if hit.
### The Size-Down Rule
After a losing trade, reduce your next position size by 50%. Rebuild after a winner.
## Short-Specific Risks
### The Short Squeeze
- Penny stocks can squeeze violently
- ALWAYS use stops
- Never "hope" a position comes back
- Size appropriately for volatility
### The Hard-to-Borrow
- Check borrow availability before trading
- High borrow fees eat into profits
- Some stocks become HTB mid-trade
### The Halt Risk
- Penny stocks can halt on volatility
- Position size for worst-case halt against you
- Halts can open significantly higher
---
# Best Practices
## DO's
✅ **Wait for multiple signals** - Single signals have lower accuracy
✅ **Trade with the trend** - Short when daily trend is down
✅ **Use the dashboard** - Check signal count before entering
✅ **Respect stops** - The indicator calculates them for a reason
✅ **Size appropriately** - Penny stocks are volatile; position small
✅ **Trade liquid stocks** - Volume ≥ 500K daily average
✅ **Know the catalyst** - Understand why the stock is moving
✅ **Take partial profits** - Secure gains at T1
✅ **Journal your trades** - Track what works and what doesn't
✅ **Time your entries** - Best shorts often come 10:30-11:30 AM
## DON'Ts
❌ **Don't short strong stocks** - If it won't go down, don't force it
❌ **Don't fight the tape** - A stock going up can keep going up
❌ **Don't average up on losers** - Adding to losing shorts is dangerous
❌ **Don't ignore the dashboard** - It exists to help you
❌ **Don't overtrade** - Quality over quantity
❌ **Don't short into news** - Wait for the reaction first
❌ **Don't trade the first 5 minutes** - Too chaotic for reliable signals
❌ **Don't hold overnight** - Penny stock gaps can destroy accounts
❌ **Don't trade without stops** - Ever.
❌ **Don't trade on tilt** - After losses, take a break
## Optimal Trading Windows
| Time (ET) | Quality | Notes |
|-----------|---------|-------|
| 9:30-9:35 | ⭐ | Too volatile, avoid |
| 9:35-10:30 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Best shorts, morning runners exhaust |
| 10:30-11:30 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Secondary exhaustion, HOD rejections |
| 11:30-2:00 | ⭐⭐ | Midday lull, lower quality |
| 2:00-3:00 | ⭐⭐⭐ | Afternoon setups develop |
| 3:00-3:30 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | End of day momentum |
| 3:30-4:00 | ⭐⭐ | Closing volatility, risky |
---
# Troubleshooting
## Common Issues
### "Signals aren't appearing"
- Check that the relevant system is enabled in settings
- Ensure minimum signals threshold isn't too high
- Verify the stock has sufficient volume for calculations
### "Too many false signals"
- Increase minimum signals threshold
- Use more conservative settings (see Settings section)
- Focus on stocks with cleaner price action
### "Dashboard not showing"
- Ensure "Show Signal Dashboard" is enabled
- Check that your chart has enough space
- Try a different dashboard position
### "VWAP line is missing"
- VWAP requires intraday timeframes (1m, 5m, 15m, etc.)
- VWAP resets daily; won't show on daily+ charts
- Ensure "Show VWAP Line" is enabled
### "Stop loss seems too tight/wide"
- Adjust Stop ATR Multiple in Risk Management settings
- Lower multiple = tighter stop
- Higher multiple = wider stop
### "Alerts not triggering"
- Verify alert is set to the correct indicator
- Check that alert hasn't expired
- Ensure notification settings are configured in TradingView
## Performance Optimization
If the indicator is slow:
1. Reduce the number of visual elements shown
2. Disable unused signal systems
3. Use on fewer simultaneous charts
4. Close unused browser tabs
---
# Changelog
## Version 1.0 (Initial Release)
- 7 core detection systems implemented
- Real-time signal dashboard
- Automatic risk management calculations
- 7 alert conditions
- Full visual overlay system
- Comprehensive input settings
## Planned Features (Future Updates)
- Scanner integration for multi-stock screening
- Machine learning signal weighting
- Backtesting statistics panel
- Volume profile analysis
- Level 2 data integration (if available)
- Custom timeframe VWAP options
---
# Support & Feedback
## Reporting Issues
When reporting issues, please include:
1. TradingView username
2. Stock symbol and timeframe
3. Screenshot of the issue
4. Your indicator settings
5. Steps to reproduce
## Feature Requests
We welcome suggestions for improving PSSP. Consider:
- What specific pattern are you trying to catch?
- How would this help your trading?
- Any reference examples?
---
# Disclaimer
**IMPORTANT: This indicator is for educational and informational purposes only.**
- Past performance does not guarantee future results
- Short selling carries unlimited risk potential
- Always use proper position sizing and stop losses
- Paper trade before using real capital
- The creator assumes no liability for trading losses
- Consult a financial advisor before trading
**Trade at your own risk.**
---
*Penny Stock Short Signal Pro v1.0*
*Pine Script v6*
*© 2025*
Liquidity Trap Strategy - ATR OptimizedLiquidity Trap Strategy – Optimized Version
1. Overview
The Liquidity Trap Strategy is a high-probability price action trading system designed to exploit “trapped buyers or sellers” around key levels from the previous trading day.
Markets: Works on any market (Forex, Crypto, Futures, Indices, Stocks)
Timeframes: Designed for 15-minute (15m) and 1-hour (1H) charts
Trading Style: “Hunter” style — trades may not happen every day, but setups are high-probability
Trade Frequency: Only first trade per day is taken for simplicity and high quality
2. Key Components
a) Daily Levels
Previous Day High (PDH) and Previous Day Low (PDL) are automatically calculated using the prior day’s bar.
These are drawn as anchored horizontal lines, extending to the current day.
PDH/PDL act as key support/resistance zones — areas where liquidity is often trapped.
b) Trap Concept
The strategy is based on the “liquidity trap” principle:
Buyer Trap (Short Entry):
Price breaks above the previous day high (PDH) → buyers think price will continue higher.
Price reverses immediately below PDH, trapping aggressive buyers above the key level.
This creates selling pressure, giving an opportunity to enter short.
Seller Trap (Long Entry):
Price breaks below the previous day low (PDL) → sellers think price will continue lower.
Price reverses immediately above PDL, trapping aggressive sellers below the key level.
This creates buying pressure, giving an opportunity to enter long.
The key idea: trapped traders cause the market to move in the opposite direction of the breakout, creating high-probability moves.
c) Trade Execution Logic
Buyer Trap / Short Entry:
Condition: high > PDH AND close < PDH AND no trade taken yet today
Entry: Short at the close of the trap candle
Stop Loss: ATR-based above the trap candle high to avoid minor wick stops
Take Profit: 2:1 Risk-to-Reward ratio
Seller Trap / Long Entry:
Condition: low < PDL AND close > PDL AND no trade taken yet today
Entry: Long at the close of the trap candle
Stop Loss: ATR-based below the trap candle low
Take Profit: 2:1 Risk-to-Reward ratio
Only the first trap trade of the day is allowed to avoid overtrading.
d) Risk Management
Stop-Loss (SL):
ATR-based to account for market volatility
Ensures the trade survives minor wick sweeps without being stopped out prematurely
Take-Profit (TP):
Fixed 2:1 R:R relative to SL
Ensures each winning trade outweighs potential losses
Trade Frequency:
Only first trade per day is allowed, making it highly selective and reducing noise
3. Visual Features
PDH/PDL Lines: Anchored to previous day, extend into current day, color-coded:
PDH → Green
PDL → Red
Trade Labels: Placed on the trap candle:
Short → Red label “Short”
Long → Green label “Long”
The visual markers make it easy to identify exactly where the trap occurred and the trade was triggered.
4. How the Strategy Works – Step by Step
Example for Short (Buyer Trap):
Market opens, PDH/PDL from yesterday are drawn.
Price spikes above PDH → some buyers enter expecting breakout continuation.
Price immediately closes back below PDH, trapping buyers.
The strategy enters short at the close of the reversal candle.
SL: placed above the trap candle using ATR to give room
TP: calculated as 2x the risk (distance from entry to SL)
Trade executes — first trade of the day. Any further trap signals today are ignored.
Example for Long (Seller Trap):
Price drops below PDL → some sellers enter.
Price immediately closes back above PDL, trapping sellers.
Strategy enters long at the close of the reversal candle.
SL: below trap candle using ATR
TP: 2:1 R:R
Trade executes — only first trade of the day.
5. Why This Strategy Works
Exploits liquidity zones: Markets often hunt stops above PDH or below PDL.
High-probability reversals: Trapped traders create strong counter moves.
ATR SL: avoids being stopped by minor market noise or wick spikes.
Selective trading: Only first trade per day → reduces overtrading and noise.
Clear visual markers: Makes manual observation and confirmation easy.
6. Key Tips for Traders
Best on high-volume instruments like Forex majors, indices, or crypto pairs with decent liquidity.
Works well on 15m and 1H charts — 15m allows quicker signals, 1H filters noise.
Avoid trading around major news releases — traps can behave differently during high volatility events.
Always backtest and use the ATR SL — never reduce SL too much, otherwise stops will trigger before the real move.
✅ Summary:
The Liquidity Trap Strategy identifies trapped buyers/sellers using previous day highs/lows.
It uses ATR-adapted stops and 2:1 R:R TP.
Only first trade per day is executed, reducing false signals.
Anchored PDH/PDL lines and labels make trade opportunities clear.
This system is low-frequency, high-probability, focusing on trading smart rather than frequently.
