I think we are going to test 1762 - 1790 area with a "zigzag" ABC wave (5,3,5), inside a bigger C or E wave.
So the idea would be to long on the B completition beetween 1713 and 1699 (ideally the best would be around 1706). Below 1699 probably this count is not a valid prediction, so SL can be tight and we will have to look to something else in terms of waves.
Soon i will post an higher timeframe idea of the upper cycle in wich this should be a part.
So the idea would be to long on the B completition beetween 1713 and 1699 (ideally the best would be around 1706). Below 1699 probably this count is not a valid prediction, so SL can be tight and we will have to look to something else in terms of waves.
Soon i will post an higher timeframe idea of the upper cycle in wich this should be a part.
Комментарий:
There is another possibile count that goes up to 60 area without passing for a retest of 710 area that would be ever a zigzag (5 3 5):
Комментарий:
This would be my view on higher cycle:
Комментарий:
This is going up, but without following my path, so something is wrong into the count of this idea and we have to look for something else.
Комментарий:
I'm almost sure that this move is not an impulse of 5 waves up but a multiple corrective move, for example like this:
the first ABC hasnt reached the right level so we have doubled. Makes sense. Lets see how will continues.
Комментарий:
I think the final destination will be something like this:
Сделка закрыта вручную:
This idea has been abandoned, new one here:
Сделка закрыта: достигнута тейк-профит цена
